Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
![]() |
Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created. We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning ** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it! Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998! |
EJ22 Rebuild ?
#26
Posted 17 October 2012 - 10:17 PM
#27
Posted 18 October 2012 - 06:21 AM
Phase 2 2.2 heads aren't dual port?
Nope, they're all single port.
Also, phase 2 intake manifolds are all the same, 2.2 and 2.5. You can swap them. Unlike on phase1 engines where 2.2 and 2.5 intakes are different.
I don't think either phase1 intake will bolt to a phase2... I'm gonna have to check next time I'm at the junk yard, because now I'm confused.
#28
Posted 18 October 2012 - 07:38 AM
#29
Posted 18 October 2012 - 08:41 AM
#30
Posted 18 October 2012 - 11:01 AM
#31
Posted 18 October 2012 - 11:35 AM
#32
Posted 01 November 2012 - 10:41 AM
#33
Posted 01 November 2012 - 10:46 AM
#34
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:02 PM
Use the valve adjustment specs from under the hood of the Legacy.
If valves are open without the cams installed then you obviously have a problem there....
If all your pistons are not exactly half way up in the cylinder bore then you didn't align the timing marks prior to removing the timing belt - which could have caused bent valves if the cam moved under spring pressure with the piston at or near TDC. With the timing marks aligned all pistons are at the half way point and cannot strike a valve.
GD
Edited by GeneralDisorder, 03 November 2012 - 03:05 PM.
#35
Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:25 PM
#36
Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:44 PM
Should be 17 bolts total IIRC. There are a few in the corners of the cooling passages right by the cylinder walls. The cylinder walls are actually notched where these bolts are.
If you're sure you got them all, a bottle jack in the bell-housing can get things started.
#37
Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:20 PM
#38
Posted 08 November 2012 - 08:25 AM
Edited by fixitguy50, 08 November 2012 - 11:23 AM.
spelling
#39
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:24 PM
Pictures will tell me more, but honesty it doesn't sound like it has enough wear to speak of. Sure the crank may want polished but if you can't feel the scuffing then there will be no measurable wear.
Wrist pins don't fail in these so some slight wear there isn't a concern.
Carbon is going to be completely normal for 280k.
As I said back on page two - you probably should have just run it till it blows. In any case now that it's apart just chuck the bits in the recycle since it's not economically viable to rebuild the 2.2's. I just got an '03 EJ251 for $650 for example. And at 280k spending a ridiculous amount of money and time to fix the car is unwise - the transmission probably doesn't have more than another 100k or less in it. You can get that from a used engine which you can typically buy a warranty on if you are so inclined.
I know you want to believe you are going about this the right way but I do this every day - I swap at least 3-4 engines a month and I've rebuilt a couple dozen as well - it's just too much hassle and the first time out you will probably not get it exactly right. How much frustration is this really worth?
GD
#40
Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:56 AM
#41
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:13 AM
In any case now that it's apart just chuck the bits in the recycle since it's not economically viable to rebuild the 2.2's.
I about spit out my coffee reading this.
Are you kidding?
I rebuild 2.2s all the time.
Polish the crank, hone the bores, have the valves done and the heads surfaced. That's about $300 right there, cheaper if you do the hone and valves yourself.
Now add another $250 in headgaskets, seals, etc...
That puts it at $550. That's $100 cheaper than a used engine. And it's BRAND NEW! Use that $100 towards new t-belt.
Junkyard engines are a crapshoot. Subarus last along time, but not forever, and I am sick of installing used stuff only for it to have problems next year.
If you have the skills and time (which the OP does, the engine is already apart:brow:) it is a way better option to rebuild. Easily economically viable.
Also, there is just a great feeling driving a fresh engine, you built yourself.
#42
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:48 AM
Edited by fixitguy50, 12 November 2012 - 11:54 AM.
#43
Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:23 PM
That puts it at $550. That's $100 cheaper than a used engine. And it's BRAND NEW! Use that $100 towards new t-belt.
I routinely get good used condition 2.2's for $100 to $300. I've installed dozens and dozens of them and of those exactly one threw a rod - and it was one the customer payed $1100 for because it had 90k on it. The yard gave him another with 72k on it and it's been fine every since.
Junkyard engines are a crapshoot. Subarus last along time, but not forever, and I am sick of installing used stuff only for it to have problems next year.
I don't buy them from "junk yards". I buy them from reputable automotive recyclers that warranty their engines and don't sell questionable "junk"
If I were going to rebuild an engine then I would rebuild a 25D (which I have plenty of laying around) and put the 2.2 heads on it. Why bother with rebuilding the 135 HP block when I can rebuild the 165 HP block for the same money and drop it in place of the 2.2?
I agree it's more economical if you are doing the work yourself but if you have never done one before then there's a high likelihood of something not being right with the build.
GD
#44
Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:24 PM
#45
Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:27 PM
The cylinders are out of round with the front to back (thrust) measurement greater at the top. The cylinders are scuffed from piston slap and the pistons are 20 thousandths smaller than standard. The cost of oversized pistons and having the cylinders bored is the problem. A set if piston is about $600 unless you can steer me to a good parts source. I would rather rebuild, just don't know if I can justify it.
How much out of round on the cylinders?
You can knurl the piston skirts to make up a portion of the .020 diameter difference and keep more oil on the skirts to dampen the slap. Runs about $10 per piston.
GD
#46
Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:46 PM
So, now that I measured the pistons and cylinders I'm looking for a replacement engine. You've recommended an EJ251. How about a EJ25d or other engines ? I't seems most the used subarus for sale have 200K and engine noise.
25D will not work easily. You need the phase-II SOHC to do a complete long-block swap. That means either the EJ251/2/3/4 or an EJ222.
Check www.car-part.com for engines in your area that will fit the bill. 1999 Forester, and Impreza 2.5RS, and 2000 to 2004 2.5's will work. As well as the '99 to '01 EJ222 that you already have. But typically they ask a lot for those as they only fit a very narrow window of cars and they try to gouge people for "rare" engines - the truth is that you can easily drop in a 2.5 in it's place.
GD
#47
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:42 AM
Edited by fixitguy50, 13 November 2012 - 11:58 AM.
not to the point
#48
Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:53 PM
You can put 2.2 heads on it but you might have to use some Cometic gaskets to bring the compression ratio under control. Usually 2.2 heads result in a compression increase due to the smaller combustion chamber sizes. You will also want to round off the edges of the smaller 2.2 combustion chamber so you don't create hot spots in the cylinder.
Easier and more desirable to just fix the valves on the 2.5 heads. Especially with 280k on the 2.2 heads - they need a rebuild with new valves and guides anyway. Seems silly to bother with the extra work when you will have 2.5 heads you can rebuild.
GD
#49
Posted 17 November 2012 - 03:36 PM
#50
Posted 17 November 2012 - 05:04 PM
I routinely get good used condition 2.2's for $100 to $300.
I somehow feel like you are exagerating a bit here. however That's great for you. But it's not a realistic representation of the market value of these engines to the average cutomer, in nationwide markets.
I don't buy them from "junk yards". I buy them from reputable automotive recyclers that warranty their engines and don't sell questionable "junk"
I buy alot of engines as well. I deal with reputable, interstate, automotive wrecker/recyclers. The last 2.2 I bought, out of washington, was $650 with a $75 core. That was last month. I can show you the reciept. And I get Shop discounts average Joe don't.
And as for warranties. You must install all new waterpump, timingbelt, thermostat, and radiator (and have radiator flow tested, with reciept) in order to even think about returning it for warranty.
I haven't had any "fail" completely....but several have been oil burners.....something that a rebuild won't do.
If I were going to rebuild an engine then I would rebuild a 25D (which I have plenty of laying around) and put the 2.2 heads on it. Why bother with rebuilding the 135 HP block when I can rebuild the 165 HP block for the same money and drop it in place of the 2.2?
Durability. 25D bottom ends are junk.....48mm journal, steep rod angle. Won't hold up to high revs like a 1.8/2.2 bottom end will.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











