Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

Recommended Posts

I have a 2001 Legacy Outback w/65k, & we were going to use our $200 Subaru Bucks towards the dealer to replace the timing belt, but the dealer told my wife not to worry about it till 105k because they make them better than they used to. I have NEVER heard a dealer say this before. You always hear 60-90k max on a timing belt. Can anyone confirm this as accurate or was he just drinking on the job? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SOHC engine puts less strain on the belt than the older DOHC engine did (2.5L). The valve train has less friction.

 

It's strange, but with the 96 to 99 2.5L DOHC engine, SOA says 105k miles. SOC (Subaru of Canada) says 60k miles (96k km). It's right in my manual and confirmed by the dealer. :argue:

 

Commuter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if any serious changes were made to the t. belt design over the years? It's of practical interest to me because I have a NOS belt for 2.2/1.8, bought with a bunch of other parts, and I wonder if using a newly made belt would be any better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am also a bit purplexed that the cold of the US does not seem to be noticed by several manufactuers that give different specs for Canada.

Certainly we rival the cold of a Canadian winter and how different is Alaska?

I think it would be wiser to publish specs like that that are more like oil specs. Just put a temp range and specify service levels for that temp.

It makes me wonder what Subaru's timeing belt spec is for Russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We do require an emission warranty but I think cam belts are free.

A lot of cars here require 60,000 mile cam belt changes.

Who can fathom the logic of Subaru?

Cold conditions of Canada were my best guess, but that's all it is, a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by 99obw

Once upon a time I read that the reason for the 105k mile interval in the US is that California requires it, so SOA went with that for the entire US. I don't know if that is true or not. Maybe it isn't climate based.

I came across this as well once before. (Perhaps we read the same post.) It seems a stretch that a state would mandate something like a timing belt interval... Oh wait, this is California we are talking about. :drunk:

 

Commuter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was my car, I wouldn't push it much farther than 60k miles/100k Km. It sucks to be stuck on the side of the road, and a victim of a towtruck driver, & a strange garage... Just my two cents (cdn).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

an American translating to the metric too.

Lets see....a Kilometer is about the same as a mile isn't it Bob?

OK we'll change at 100,000 miles...

It has been said that the only Americans to make a successful conversion to the metric system are its drug dealers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...