REally? Pull the engine to get the trans out?
if you need to pull the transmission then the transmission needs to come out. i would not pull the engine, sounds like a lot of extra work, but there are many compelling reasons to not drop a trans too.
I would drop the transmission from underneath. seems even more logical if you don't have a lift. Though if you have a lift you can snake chains around the engine to use the lift to remove/install a transmission underneath the car without pulling the engine.
These things are awesome for scooting engines/trans around and the last magazine I got yesterday in the mail had them for only $7.99 or $8.99:
http://www.harborfre...olly-93888.htmlthe fastest *possible* is the transmission, it *can* come out much quicker than the engine. just basic logistics and math...fewer parts to remove.
I use *'s to qualify because pulling a transmission is annoying because you have to work under your car and devise solutions for removing, installing in a confined space. it is very easy to hate the task so you'll hear strong opinions to the contrary. Removal is generally easy, can drop it by yourself. Installing is much more difficult and very much aided by an extra hand or two.
If you have physical limitations or are going to need to lie on freezing cold concrete or aren't good at figuring out a way to hold the trans to remove/install...then you're going to hate working under the car.
If you have an engine lift you can also pull the engine/trans together but you need lots of room to lift up to get the entire lump to clear the radiator at a steep angle.
If I were replacing the clutch, would you recommend the same procedure?
in that case the transmission does not have to come out, you just need access to the clutch which is given by removing the engine. so engine removal is often the chosen way there. then you're also provided easier access to timing belts and headgaskets for folks that also want to address those common maintenance items.