Jump to content


Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!

Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.

We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
  • Say hello and join the conversation
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Classifieds with all sorts of Subaru goodies
  • Photo hosting in our gallery
  • Meet other cool people with cool cars
Seriously, what are you waiting for? Make your life more fulfilling and join today! You and your Subaru won't regret it, we guarantee** it.

* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!

Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!

Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

I am looking for more power down low below 1000 RPM


  • Please log in to reply
112 replies to this topic

#101 NorthCoast

NorthCoast

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 422 posts
  • Puyallup, WA

Posted 10 February 2014 - 09:19 AM

Yes.  Tested it again yesterday at Johnson's Creek in the mud and snow. Much fun.



#102 apintonut

apintonut

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 233 posts
  • ravensdale wa

Posted 11 February 2014 - 01:43 AM

Im still looking for a 2.2 and was doing some reading looks like you wana find 1999+ 2.2 heads for lower torque rpm's and better air flow 0n a 1996- engine to keep non interfaces engine

http://en.m.wikipedi...ubaru_EJ_engine

Edited by apintonut, 11 February 2014 - 01:44 AM.


#103 Silas Cruse

Silas Cruse

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Dallas Oregon

Posted 16 February 2014 - 11:17 PM

Hydrogen and Oxygen gasses separated through electrolysis.

 

 

The problem has always been creating enough of it to actually be worth using.  If you want to produce alot of it, you need alot of electricity, which bogs down the ALT, so claims to improved effieciency are inconsistant.  It's always variable depending on the type of system you run.

 

You can produce it at home, and then capture and transfer it.....but hydrogen is hard to contain, and very explosive too......

 

I have yet to see an HHO system with any real world practical returns.

While serving in the Submarine Navy  I ran the Oxygen generators,

Pure water plus Potassium plus high voltage equals Hydrogen gas and Oxygen Gas.

H20 + K + V = H2 O2

although the machines were each bigger than an L series.



#104 Uberoo

Uberoo

    Subaru Wheeler

  • Members
  • 3,391 posts
  • lewiston,ID

Posted 17 February 2014 - 03:04 AM

but potassium REACTS explosively with water.



#105 Gloyale

Gloyale

    It's a sickness

  • Members
  • 9,057 posts
  • Corvallis, OR PNW

Posted 17 February 2014 - 11:14 AM

Im still looking for a 2.2 and was doing some reading looks like you wana find 1999+ 2.2 heads for lower torque rpm's and better air flow 0n a 1996- engine to keep non interfaces engine

http://en.m.wikipedi...ubaru_EJ_engine

 

99 heads won't fit any of the older intake setups.....so you'd need the 99 2.2 harness ECU as well.

 

Just get a 90-96 EJ22



#106 Tsuru

Tsuru

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 165 posts
  • Darby, Montana

Posted 19 February 2014 - 12:55 PM

isn't H2 O2 Hydrogen Peroxide?



#107 Gloyale

Gloyale

    It's a sickness

  • Members
  • 9,057 posts
  • Corvallis, OR PNW

Posted 19 February 2014 - 01:25 PM

isn't H2 O2 Hydrogen Peroxide?

 

I think he meant H2  and O2 seperately.

 

not H2O2



#108 Dj7291993

Dj7291993

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 244 posts
  • Falcon, CO (Colo Springs)

Posted 09 March 2014 - 11:19 AM

Well, this isn't quite ready for mass use, and is probably way out of budget to get them to fit it to your engine, but if you eliminated the camshafts, you could probably get a lot more torque at low rpm, without sacrificing your high rpm.  This video is part of a series done touring the Swedish car maker, Koenigsegg.  This particular one, the explain one of their technologies they are working on for the future, called the Cargen Free Valve System.  Probably not practical yet, but something to get your brain going.

 



#109 apintonut

apintonut

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 233 posts
  • ravensdale wa

Posted 09 March 2014 - 12:25 PM

What vid?

#110 Dj7291993

Dj7291993

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 244 posts
  • Falcon, CO (Colo Springs)

Posted 09 March 2014 - 11:51 PM

What vid?

 

It displays as part of the post for me.  Here's a link:

http://youtu.be/Bch5B23_pu0


Edited by Dj7291993, 09 March 2014 - 11:52 PM.


#111 Subaru_dude

Subaru_dude

    1000+ Super USER!

  • Members
  • 1,473 posts
  • Morristown, TN

Posted 10 March 2014 - 05:14 PM

I really don't know if it hurts the engine, but retarding the timing will give you CRAZY torque down low. Back when I didn't know anything about timing, I had mine set pretty much right on top dead center. You could let it idle up 10 degree hills no problem. Ran like crap in any other situation though.



#112 Tsuru

Tsuru

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 165 posts
  • Darby, Montana

Posted 11 March 2014 - 01:50 AM

I think he meant H2  and O2 seperately.

 

not H2O2

Thank you.



#113 apintonut

apintonut

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 233 posts
  • ravensdale wa

Posted 20 March 2014 - 01:25 AM

On I was reading on another thread on here about injector improvements from other engines good read if a bit hard to follow




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users