NorthCoast Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Yes. Tested it again yesterday at Johnson's Creek in the mud and snow. Much fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apintonut Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 (edited) Im still looking for a 2.2 and was doing some reading looks like you wana find 1999+ 2.2 heads for lower torque rpm's and better air flow 0n a 1996- engine to keep non interfaces engine http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subaru_EJ_engine Edited February 11, 2014 by apintonut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Cruse Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Hydrogen and Oxygen gasses separated through electrolysis. The problem has always been creating enough of it to actually be worth using. If you want to produce alot of it, you need alot of electricity, which bogs down the ALT, so claims to improved effieciency are inconsistant. It's always variable depending on the type of system you run. You can produce it at home, and then capture and transfer it.....but hydrogen is hard to contain, and very explosive too...... I have yet to see an HHO system with any real world practical returns. While serving in the Submarine Navy I ran the Oxygen generators, Pure water plus Potassium plus high voltage equals Hydrogen gas and Oxygen Gas. H20 + K + V = H2 O2 although the machines were each bigger than an L series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberoo Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 but potassium REACTS explosively with water. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloyale Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Im still looking for a 2.2 and was doing some reading looks like you wana find 1999+ 2.2 heads for lower torque rpm's and better air flow 0n a 1996- engine to keep non interfaces engine http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subaru_EJ_engine 99 heads won't fit any of the older intake setups.....so you'd need the 99 2.2 harness ECU as well. Just get a 90-96 EJ22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsuru Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 isn't H2 O2 Hydrogen Peroxide? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloyale Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 isn't H2 O2 Hydrogen Peroxide? I think he meant H2 and O2 seperately. not H2O2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dj7291993 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 Well, this isn't quite ready for mass use, and is probably way out of budget to get them to fit it to your engine, but if you eliminated the camshafts, you could probably get a lot more torque at low rpm, without sacrificing your high rpm. This video is part of a series done touring the Swedish car maker, Koenigsegg. This particular one, the explain one of their technologies they are working on for the future, called the Cargen Free Valve System. Probably not practical yet, but something to get your brain going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apintonut Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 What vid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dj7291993 Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 (edited) What vid? It displays as part of the post for me. Here's a link: http://youtu.be/Bch5B23_pu0 Edited March 10, 2014 by Dj7291993 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subaru_dude Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 I really don't know if it hurts the engine, but retarding the timing will give you CRAZY torque down low. Back when I didn't know anything about timing, I had mine set pretty much right on top dead center. You could let it idle up 10 degree hills no problem. Ran like crap in any other situation though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsuru Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I think he meant H2 and O2 seperately. not H2O2 Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apintonut Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 On I was reading on another thread on here about injector improvements from other engines good read if a bit hard to follow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.