Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

EA82 O2 sensor


Recommended Posts

Well how did it run, you probably already took it for a spin right? !

 

In general yes the ECU uses that to adjust the air fuel ratio.  Without it it'll presumably run rich and get poor mileage.

I'm not sure if this actually would happen in this case but too much fuel washes the oil off the cylilnder walls, dilutes the oil.

 

But you may also need to verify which engine/vehicle you're talking about.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a 1993 Loyale 4 wheel drive wagon. it seems to be running fine so far. it has more power. however I might try to find  a decent caty at the scrap yard to replace the one i just gutted. it seems to me like it was designed to have an O2 sensor for a reason. so even though there are no noticeable problems from removing it, i just don't feel great about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my understanding is the engine runs without the O2 when it's first started until the engine is warmed up.

once it reaches a certain temperature then it uses the O2 sensor for feedback and adjusting air-fuel ratio. ;

 

without the O2 sensor you're just stuck in that "pre-warm up" mode and probably running rich.

 

given you have a fuel injected 93 loyale yeah I think you would be better off with one. though i've definitely driven around with oxygen sensors before and it's not a problem as a makeshift or temporary situaion, i'm not sure what long term would look like.

 

in later lie 1995-2004 engines with a rear Oxygen sensor, those aren't used by the ECU and can be compeltely removed without any issues at all because the ECU doesn't even use them. they're only used to trigger a CEL, not for drivability. so you can ignore those, never replace them, remove them, and it doesn't matter for drivability. but that's different than yours - it's actually used for the air-fuel ratio.

Edited by grossgary
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary is just being modest, he is a Elite Master of Subaru :)

 

Your impression of more power is probably valid (somewhat), but the downside is longer-term damage caused by running rich and environmental damage by not running a cat while using unleaded fuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...