Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
![]() |
Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created. We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning ** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it! Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998! |
Quattro San lives! (Updated as of 11/2/2004)
#1
Posted 21 October 2004 - 10:03 PM
Any how, back to the story at hand. So, we moved this little bugger from its resting place (After filling the flat tires) only to find that pushing it didn't do much because the shoes in the driver's side rear brake were frozen to the drum. After dumping a bunch of oil on the gap in the drum it moved freely and was actually very easy to push! Anyway, we filled the tank with 92 octane (Almost put in leaded race gas!) and filled the radiator and checked the oil. Everything looked good so we gave her a try. Even after sitting for at least a year and a half (Probably hasn't been driven in at least 5-10) the poor car turned over! Then I remembered it was carburated so I fiddled with the choke and it actually started and idled very steadly! However we were told the turbo (IHI RHB6 for those interested) probably had a bad seal. This is probably true because the exhaust was full of blue smoke! We had also been told that it went through is entire supply of coolant in about five minutes, but we weren't told how. I assumed it had a really bad blown head gasket (It was a development car that has been beat on pretty hard after all). Thankfully it only appeared to be a very bad water pump gasket! Those are cheaper and much easier than a rebuild! So at this point we need a new set of tires, new turbo or reseal kit (Supplied by a contact at IHI) and a reman water pump. The interior is toast, but I'm going to put my two cents into having it reproduced as it is very unique. At that point we can give it a run around the block and see what else it needs! Wish us luck in the resurection of this monument in subaru performance history!
More pics can be seen here: http://usmb.net/gallery/album287
#2
Posted 21 October 2004 - 10:31 PM
Uses an SU carburetor (Japanese manufacturer?). Don't think that SU could handle the airflow... our '67 Datsun 1600 had a pair.
Also, pic#7 in your gallery is a fuel flow meter, if my swisscheese memory is working right. back in the early '80s I had one of those as part of a "car computer" setup.
Good Luck! Kind of wish now that my daughter had opted for WWU instead of CWU!
#3
Posted 21 October 2004 - 10:33 PM
Also, pic#7 in your gallery is a fuel flow meter, if my swisscheese memory is working right. back in the early '80s I had one of those as part of a "car computer" setup.
How the heck does that thing work?!?! Also, what the heck does it do?!?!
#4
Posted 21 October 2004 - 10:39 PM
HA! thats the same crappy carb our fussy volvo 1800S has. Not a very good carb, you should slap on a DCOE 40mm carb. I'm gonna want to come take a better look at that one of these days! (Galen remember the problems I had that one day when I brought the 1800 over? Ya that was the carbs leaking gas everywhere.)Pretty cool!
Uses an SU carburetor (Japanese manufacturer?). Don't think that SU could handle the airflow... our '67 Datsun 1600 had a pair.
Also, pic#7 in your gallery is a fuel flow meter, if my swisscheese memory is working right. back in the early '80s I had one of those as part of a "car computer" setup.
Good Luck! Kind of wish now that my daughter had opted for WWU instead of CWU!
#5
Posted 21 October 2004 - 10:47 PM
#6
Posted 21 October 2004 - 10:49 PM
#7
Posted 21 October 2004 - 10:50 PM
How the heck does that thing work?!?! Also, what the heck does it do?!?!
Again, I hope I am remembering the right piece of equipment...
Fuel goes into one side of a circular track which has a small ball (plastic?) that can roll around track. As fuel enters track it pushes ball around track, fuel exits through another hole in track. There is an LED and a phototransistor, one above and one below the track and looking through windows on a portion of the track... ball goes past and interrupts LED signal to detector. Primitive CPU counts the pulses, applies appropriate multiplier, and voila! GPH!!!
Simple...
#8
Posted 21 October 2004 - 11:00 PM
HA! thats the same crappy carb our fussy volvo 1800S has. Not a very good carb, you should slap on a DCOE 40mm carb. I'm gonna want to come take a better look at that one of these days! (Galen remember the problems I had that one day when I brought the 1800 over? Ya that was the carbs leaking gas everywhere.)
SUs usually don't leak gas. Probably had the seals go too dry at one point. SUs have a some advantages over DCOEs... especially cost!!! They (and the later Strombergs) were the mainstay of British performance cars until Lucas (Prince Of Darkness!!!
That being said, I have personally had enough of SUs. They use metal-to-metal sliding surfaces on their constant-depression slides, which can gum up pretty quickly. And I think I spent more time synchronizing the dual SUs on our Triumph more than I spent driving it.
#9
Posted 31 October 2004 - 03:09 PM
...Also, pic#7 in your gallery is a fuel flow meter, if my swisscheese memory is working right. back in the early '80s I had one of those as part of a "car computer" setup...
FYI: I just ran across the computer head and wiring harness that my fuel flow sensor was connected to.
#10
Posted 31 October 2004 - 03:27 PM
#11
Posted 31 October 2004 - 05:11 PM
#12
Posted 01 November 2004 - 07:00 PM
#13
Posted 01 November 2004 - 10:15 PM
#14
Posted 01 November 2004 - 10:25 PM
#15
Posted 01 November 2004 - 11:05 PM
#16
Posted 01 November 2004 - 11:15 PM
The diesel heads sucked I heard. If I have time, I might putz with them a bit.woah!!! back up jes a sec. I looked through your gallery, and the Quattro San is pretty kewl and all, but how bout a little more info on the diesel heads that are in the one pic!!! Like how well that went over, and how long before the block spontaniously migrated!
This is WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY'S CAR! Nobody can legally own it except WWU. I'm a student in the Vehicle Research Institute at WWU and one of my projects is to fix this puppy up. We dont have an appropriate longblock to replace the original with (Except the one thats in my garage), and this is avalible. If anyone in the Bellingham area has a GOOD engine that they want to donate to Quattro San, that would be great too!
#17
Posted 02 November 2004 - 12:02 AM
#18
Posted 02 November 2004 - 10:12 AM
#19
Posted 02 November 2004 - 10:21 AM
The diesel heads sucked I heard. If I have time, I might putz with them a bit.
This is WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY'S CAR! Nobody can legally own it except WWU. I'm a student in the Vehicle Research Institute at WWU and one of my projects is to fix this puppy up. We dont have an appropriate longblock to replace the original with (Except the one thats in my garage), and this is avalible. If anyone in the Bellingham area has a GOOD engine that they want to donate to Quattro San, that would be great too!
I'm glad that you are fixing it up, then I won't have to when it comes to my place. Dr. Seal told me that I could store it for the University when I get my garage built. So it will be nice to have it running.
A side note, that is not the orginal engine, Jackie Chan blew up the orginal one, that is the quickly thrown together second engine.
#20
Posted 02 November 2004 - 12:53 PM
I wonder which scene that is in for Cannonball Run
#21
Posted 02 November 2004 - 01:51 PM
#22
Posted 02 November 2004 - 09:25 PM
#23
Posted 02 November 2004 - 10:41 PM
#24
Posted 03 November 2004 - 12:14 AM
Some figures from the articles compared to the EA81 turbo wagon R&T tested: (Note these are impressive only for a subaru)
Quattro San has a 4 speed D/R manual and the turbo wagon has a 3 speed 4WD automatic.
Quattro San: Estimated 110hp @ 5200rpm
Stock Turbo: 95hp @ 4800rpm
QS: Estimated 135lbft @ 3000rpm
ST: 123lbft @ 2000rpm
QS: Curb weight 2240 lbs
ST: curb weight 2630lbs/ test weight 2775lbs (Tested with Turbo 10 package [sunroof, electric windows, cruise control, electric mirrors and digi dash] along with a roof rack and misc options)
QS: 0-60 9.67 sec
ST: 0-60 13.0 sec
QS: 1/4 Mile 17.10 @ 77.7mph
ST: 1/4 Mile 19.0 @70mph
QS: 60-0 160 ft (Note: Nothing on the braking system was touched)
ST: 60-0 168(FWD)/158(4WD) (Note: The stock turbo car stopped better in 4WD than FWD)
QS: Estimated Skidpad .82g
ST: 200ft Skidpad .720g
QS: Brake diameter 7.2 in discs front/ 7.1 in rear drums
ST: 8.9 in discs front/ 7.1 in rear drums
I'll save the the other info for later. Maybe I gave you too much info too soon...
#25
Posted 03 November 2004 - 07:45 AM
When I talked with Dr. Seal, he stated that they did the reseach work for the EJ series engines, not the EA82s. Look at the way the belts are on the EA81, that is one belt, not two like the EA82s.Well what I understand from word of mouth is that FHI farmed out the development of the overhead cam system for the EA82 (There is an engine sitting on a stand in the VRI that has an EA81 block with custom heads milled out of aluminum and OHC).
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










