Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
|Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.
We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!
Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!
CIS Fuel Injection Conversion - Write-Up with Pictures!!
Posted 07 June 2003 - 10:14 PM
I always liked the CIS system. It's very simple and there are a ton of them in the wrecking yards.
Posted 10 June 2003 - 04:06 PM
Posted 10 June 2003 - 08:48 PM
Posted 10 June 2003 - 09:02 PM
Posted 10 June 2003 - 10:13 PM
In addition to adding CIS, I also:
-switched to MPFI heads
-did a DIY P&P to those heads
-switched to "spider" intake manifold
-switched to MPFI distributor
-changed spark plugs
-removed entire A/C system
With all these variables, it's hard to conclusively say what caused the changes I'm experiencing. On top of that, I have a crappy 3spd automatic that makes it really hard to tell what the engine is doing in the first place. I also haven't fine tuned my ignition timing yet.
Disclaimers aside, I <span style="text-decoration:underline">have</span> noticed more power. It's not much faster than before, but it doesn't sound strained anymore. I guess you could say that it now takes less effort to do the same job as before.
Right now I have a hesitation when coming off idle. I'm hoping that it's not something the P&P caused. I think that it'll be faster once I fix the timing. I'm also planning to uncork the exhaust some.
I think it'll be easier to see the pros/cons when I try this on my EA81, but that might not be until next summer.
Posted 11 June 2003 - 01:37 AM
Just my $.02
Posted 19 June 2003 - 09:56 AM
It sure woudl be nice for this post to be made accessible. It has such good info and makes very good reading.
Posted 19 June 2003 - 11:51 AM
I assume there are 2 fuel pumps running this system? vs a single pump on most efi cars.
I have doubts about how "easy" this is for most people wanting to convert fuel injection. when I changed my toyota pu too fuel injection I chose to go with a efi manifold and a programable controler from SDS. it was a long process and that was more or less a bolt on.
dont get me wrong I fully respect the inovation that must have gone into this and a lot of work. I just want to point out that a stock system would be a good deal easyer to install and troubleshoot. or a aftermarket efi system.
my cousin is a volvo turbo guy and says that to bring thier cars up to the next level they are going to efi from cis. go figure.
Posted 20 June 2003 - 12:42 AM
For maximum performance, you can't beat programmable EFI. Of course, that usually costs at least $1000 and requires programming. From what I've seen, programming often involves a laptop and/or dyno to do it right. CIS only cost me about $50 and worked right away.
Factory MPFI systems seem pretty nightmarish to me. I'd definitely want to have an entire parts car before attempting such a swap. Even then, they are set up for a single configuration which includes many emissions controls, so they often don't adapt well to changes (such as increased boost). CIS exists on many different cars while using mostly the exact same parts, and any emissions controls are external to the system. Not to mention, it's as easy to wire up as a basic stereo system.
As for the complexity issue, I think it really depends on your view of complex. EFI is by its nature more electrically complex, while CIS by its nature is more mechanically complex. In either case, the most complex parts are hidden and need not be messed with. Yes, CIS problems can sometimes be difficult to figure out, kinda like a carburetor, but once again it only cost me $50.
Posted 20 June 2003 - 09:08 AM
Im glad we mostly agree on this. I would like to use that spider manifold set up on my RX. of course it would be efi for me. you are close about the cost of programable efi. the SDS system was about 800 dollars without injectors or pump. but it comes with a control pad to program the system.
I guess im just trying to say that the gains from converting a mpfi car to csi would be minimal if any.
you are correct about turbo charging. stock N/A cars efi cannot maintain fuel control without dodads like adjustable fuel pressure regulators.
keep on building crazy subes, this is good stuff I like it.8o
Posted 20 June 2003 - 01:29 PM
I've had experience with the $800 SDS system. My VW buddy had that on his Scirocco, and I helped him program it. It was a little bit of a pain without a dyno, as he had to drive on the freeway while holding both the brake and gas while I watched the mixture meter. He opted to stick with CIS on his latest VW project because the SDS (without O2 sensor) reduced normal driveability too much. I will say that I did like the SDS system. If I were going to put aftermarket EFI on one of my cars, I'd probably choose one of their closed-loop systems, but I'd want to do the initial tuning on a dyno.
Rest assured, there will be plenty more crazy Soobs to come! (I just bought a EA81T engine for my 2wd Hatchback!!!)
Guest_x silvershad0w x_*
Posted 20 June 2003 - 02:29 PM
Secondly, I had to jump into the whole CIS-EFI debate and put in my two cents. Since I work with EFI quite a bit anymore and obviously biased myself towards that end, I don't want anyone thinking that you should pick one over the other all the time, this is going to depend totally on the individual and the project at hand - my main goal is really to show benefits of FI, either CIS or EFI over carbys, which are outdated and I really think that -anyone- considering a fuel delivery system upgrade should look into FI as the best alternative.
Main things that keep people away from FI are cost and charting new territory, and it may seem more (too) complex to make it worth bothering with. Aftermarket FI has been beaten like a dead horse, there are so many companies doing it - Haltech, SDS, Holly, Edelbrock, etc etc etc, at least 10 more names in there. They each have a target market, all trying to provide 'bolt-on' fuel injection, at a price.
The point I try to make, and I think it's in line with Noah's ideas, is that not a lot of us here are going to spend that much money for fuel injection on our cars, especially when I can spend half what a SDS system costs bare bones and get a Weber that is proven to give my ride a good kick in the pants. I of course, have been working with this MegaSquirt for a while now in my spare time, tinkering here and there seeing what works and what doesn't, playing with costs, etc etc. and I've come up with a pretty solid way to get you a fully tunable EFI bolt on that will cost less than a weber and give better performance, tuneability, driveability, you know, the way FI is supposed to work. My goal is to make it easy enough and and attractive enough so that it's just as easy or easier for Joe-Blo to bolt it on as it is to do a Weber upgrade.
My First published work will be with changing a carby EA82 over to SPFI w/ megasquirt. Now this is just the fuel side, and i think it's a good start and about the most basic and easy conversion. Once I tune it up I can get all the baseline numbers and post them, making everyone else's tuning that much easier, because you can start with a baseline and work from there.
I am moving on to other things, distributorless ignition, MPFI converted over to MS (just as easy as SPFI), adding a turbo to any of these setups, etc etc etc. If there is much interest in this once I actually get off my butt and write all this stuff up, I might make junkyard runs and start making ready to use wiring harnesses and everything, if people are interested.
One last little jaunt, when you plan on a FI system, there area lot more 'hidden' little costs than just a simple carb upgrade. For instance you buy just the baseline SDS system, expensive enough already, you are no where near ready to FI a previously carbbed car - you will come to find all sort of extra features you want and need that they happily charge more for to add it on for you. You can avoid all of that and keep the cost very reasonable, and that is what I hope to pioneer, if ya'll have interest by the time I get around to it.
Posted 21 June 2003 - 10:16 AM
I briefly looked at MegaSquirt a few months ago after Skip had mentioned it. It reminded me alot of Linux with its open code, etc. It looked like something that would certainly work on our cars, but would take alot of effort from some pioneering person to try it first. I just don't have time or the facilities to be that person, so I'm glad to see that someone else can be.
Everybody seems to think that my CIS conversion took alot of work. In reality, the vast majority of my time on this project was consumed by the task of putting the MPFI heads on the engine. After that, I probably only spent one full day on the mounting and connecting of the CIS components, including the wiring. Of course, I had already put a fair amount of time into research and planning, but hopefully I can shorten that part of the process for the next person.
I know that SubaruJunkie is planning to give CIS a try, and I'd love to see someone else try it out. If anyone has any questions, don't hesitate to post here or email me.
Posted 02 July 2003 - 12:22 PM
Posted 07 July 2003 - 02:32 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users