Jump to content


Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!

Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.

We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
  • Say hello and join the conversation
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Classifieds with all sorts of Subaru goodies
  • Photo hosting in our gallery
  • Meet other cool people with cool cars
Seriously, what are you waiting for? Make your life more fulfilling and join today! You and your Subaru won't regret it, we guarantee** it.

* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!

Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!

Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

rx vs. xt6


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 archemitis

archemitis

    guy smiley

  • Members
  • 3,554 posts
  • the big minnie

Posted 01 December 2004 - 08:44 PM

just a thought, i have driven everything before the svx, and after 81, but never an rx.
how much slower are they than an xt6, not much? alot? im talkin mostly stock. thanks

#2 Turbone

Turbone

    The Original Rob

  • Moderator
  • 12,162 posts
  • WA

Posted 01 December 2004 - 09:34 PM

Thats a no brainer. Both being stock engines, the XT6 has 145hp compared to the RX @ 111hp.

#3 calebz

calebz

    Andys Coupe killed my cat

  • Administrator
  • 7,547 posts
  • Tacoma

Posted 01 December 2004 - 10:17 PM

115 for 87+;)

#4 DerFahrer

DerFahrer

    Formerly subyluvr2212

  • Members
  • 2,419 posts
  • Orlando, FL

Posted 02 December 2004 - 02:22 AM

Yep, no contest. Two more cylinders is two more cylinders. 30 more hp, and probably a similar torque spread too...

#5 grossgary

grossgary

    Elite Master of the Subaru

  • Members
  • 20,329 posts
  • WV

Posted 02 December 2004 - 04:33 AM

if it's anything like the EA82 in the XT (same motor), then way slower. no comparison. much better gas mileage but no comparison for power, pulling, acclerating...etc.

did you mean to compare the rx turbo and xt6 or NA rx?

#6 WJM

WJM

    SUBARU

  • Members
  • 7,828 posts

Posted 02 December 2004 - 10:34 AM

no such thing as NA RX.

STOCK vs STOCK, 87+ RX vs stock XT6 both MT 4WD...I would think they would be close to even...but undoubtly the XT is would be faster. Stock an RX will onyl get to 120 MPH...and thats pushing it. It areodynamically and high RPM power challenged. The XT6 has the power/TQ to get on up there, PLUS a HUGE advantage in areodynamics. I belive it is said it can do 140+ MPH stock....the SVX can do well past 160 in stock form due to aredynamics.

Speaking on XT6...i just built (in my head on the long road tripe yesterday)a VF22/8.5:1/rods/crank/MS+DIS/etc...ER27 that i tihnk will put out about 500 HP...all in an 85 DL sedan with FT4WD conversion/stripped out/rollbar...thats about 2200 lbs with 500 hp! :slobber:

#7 Myxalplyx

Myxalplyx

    Old Wise and Dumb

  • Members
  • 1,834 posts
  • New Castle

Posted 02 December 2004 - 04:51 PM

just a thought, i have driven everything before the svx, and after 81, but never an rx.
how much slower are they than an xt6, not much? alot? im talkin mostly stock. thanks

:lol:

An RX would be crushed. Alot slower I'd say. I'm talking high 16 second 1/4 mile vs 18-19 second 1/4 mile (for RX turbo). An RX would be even slower. :-p A closer competitor would be a manual trannied RX turbo. Even still, a manual trannied RX turbo would get the can-oh-whoop-arse. I have both and it's no comparison. And I REALLY like the RX turbo. It just doesn't have the low end torque. My FTWD RX weighs around 2700 while the autotrannied AWD XT6 weight just over 2900lbs. Even with the weight difference, by the time the turbo spools up, the XT6 is gone. I'll show you what I mean stock for stock.

These are hp and torque graphs of my stock AWD auto XT6 and stock RX turbo FTWD. Pay no mind to the bottom line in the graphs as the AWD XT6 was dyno'd in FWD mode (fuse installed) since the AWD wouldn't shift gears. Autos are hard to start at low rpm so that's why the XT6 starts above 4000rpm.

Anyways, when the XT6 has 109hp, the RX turbo only has 74hp. That's a 35hp difference. Yikes! On the torque front, where the XT6 has 122lb-ft of torque, the RX turbo has 81lb-ft of torque. That's a 41lb-ft difference in torque. That's a difference you can feel. I just picked a random point in the dyno graphs to show the difference. I'm kinda wishing I had a manual trannied XT6 so I can really dyno the differences between mods. I'm starting to get used to this manual stuff. :drunk:


Posted Image



Posted Image

#8 archemitis

archemitis

    guy smiley

  • Members
  • 3,554 posts
  • the big minnie

Posted 02 December 2004 - 05:55 PM

i was hopin youd chime in since you currently own a couple of each.

thats good info. thanks




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users