Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

so just why does subaru...............


Recommended Posts

after reading about all the head gasket issues and problems with the 2.5

interference type engine.....can anybody tell me why Subaru designs engines with rubber timing belts instead of metal ones? I,ve had many GM vehicles

over 100,000 miles.......never replaced a timing belt on any.

 

Starting to wonder about my own 98 2.2 Impreza......

and maybe the Forester i was going to buy for the wife needs some more thought..... any thoughts from you appreciated...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw quite a discussion on this on another board a few years ago when Subaru brought out the 3.0L H6 and people wondered why it had timing chains instead of a belt. (See answer below.)

 

There are pros and cons to both belts and chains. This is just a very quick summary. Belts are less expensive, quieter and have lower losses. The downside is that they have to be changed more often. Even a chain wears and stretches over time. In the H6 engine, the chain reaches linear speeds of nearly 50 mph as I recall!!

 

I saw a post of an article right form a Subaru engineer as to why they chose a chain for the H6 engine. One word... packaging! That is, they wanted to minimize the size of the engine, the length in particular. A belt would have added about an inch to the length of the engine. As it was, they managed to design the H6 just under an inch (22 mm) longer than the the 2.5L H4 engine. See where they were going? So sometimes the reason is not what you might expect.

 

Commuter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after reading about all the head gasket issues and problems with the 2.5

interference type engine.....can anybody tell me why Subaru designs engines with rubber timing belts instead of metal ones? I,ve had many GM vehicles

over 100,000 miles.......never replaced a timing belt on any.

 

Starting to wonder about my own 98 2.2 Impreza......

and maybe the Forester i was going to buy for the wife needs some more thought..... any thoughts from you appreciated...!

Nothing wrong with Rubber Timing Belts... I'd rather them over a chain. If the chain goes, it's (in my opinion) harder to replace than the belt. Most belts can run 100k miles without issue. I think that design of the motor has something to do with the difference between chain and belt... If I remember correctly, OHC (over head cam) has the belt driven timing and the OHV (over head valve) has the chain. The OHV has pushrods to actuate the valves. Much shorter distance on the chain (at least on the one's I've seen) than the belt's I've replaced. GM is not exempt from belts, I changed one on my wife's old Chevette.

 

I wouldn't let these little thing stop you from buying Subaru. We were hardcore GM before our first (01 OBW) and the ride is far superior, not to mention the AWD. We've only had 2 issues in 72k and 4 years that needed dealer attention. 1 was a known problem that resulted in a reflash of the ECM, and the alternator bearing went after 60k. I complained about the alternator bearings and SOA covered 1/2 the cost. It was cheaper for me to have them do it than for me to do it alone. The reman alternator was close to $200. We paid $160 as our 1/2.

 

We had to trade our 95 Corsica & 97 Cavalier because they were in the shop constantly, everything that could go wrong, did. We bought GM because my wife's entire family is all retired from there. Not any more. I won't even mention my Dodge experience... You think that Sube's have head gasket problems, you haven't owned a Chrysler product with their 2.2 4 banger in it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right to ask these questions. In general, interference engines are a bad deal for the owner. Interference engines provide a slight improvement in efficiency. But any problem with the timing belt can leave the owner paying for a replacement engine. The timing belt breaking isn't the only problem that will cause the engine to self-destruct. If the water pump freezes, if one of the idlers fail, if the tensioner gives out, or if the belt just "skips" a notch or two, kiss your engine goodbye.

Some on this board will say, " Come on, if they're replaced on schedule, timing belts almost never fail". And they're right, BUT you're taking a pretty big risk for almost NO benefit.

There are pros and cons to both timing chains and timing belts. But interefence engines are a real losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just had the timing belt changed on my Impreza - the only thing I pay the dealer to do, because the stamp in the service book looks good when you sell the car! - and the belt had 60k and five years on it. Looked almost new. So, invisible internal stress notwithstanding the belt could probably have soldiered on for a while yet. Dealer says they have never seen one break.

 

My EJ22 belt looked good as new when I replaced that, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um,,,The DUDE

 

arent most subaru engines with exception to some of the newest ones, all non interference engines??

 

Far as i know the only thing that happens if the timing belt on my 97 impreza breaks it just means a tow and a timing belt.....im pretty sure most suby engines are non interference

 

Cory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<<can anybody tell me why Subaru designs engines with rubber timing belts instead of metal ones?>>

 

better gas mileage, and noise reduction.

 

<<yes someone please chime in with the correct info regarding subes being interference or non-interference motors.>>

 

this has been covered in previous posts but i'll post some answers

EA series

ER27

non inter- first gen EJ22

EG33 (only because it has cam gears that never fail)

EJ18

 

inter-

second generation EJ22

EJ25

EJ20

EJ255 Forester XT

EJ237 STi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...