Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
![]() |
Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created. We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning ** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it! Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998! |
Roof rack weight capacity - pushing the limits?
#1
Posted 27 September 2005 - 05:24 PM
In the local classifieds there's an ad for a 4"x8" 24' wood beam that I might have a use for, I'm always looking for good deals on building materials and I thought hmmmm... that may be going too far. Based on some material density numbers I found online and some wild guesses, this sucker would weigh around 150 to 175 pounds.
Before you tell me I'm an idiot for even considering this: 1) It would only be transported a few miles at low speeds, and 2) The load would be very well secured with nylon webbing ratcheting and/or cammed cargo straps, not just tied up there with a piece of twine. The front and back would be connected to the tow hooks of the car.
All of this reminds me of one of my favorites from www.snopes.com:
http://www.snopes.co...otos/lumber.asp
What's the heaviest or biggest thing you've carried on your Yakima rack on a Subaru? Am I crazy for considering this?
Steve
#2
Posted 27 September 2005 - 06:00 PM
I am 90% sure the roof will survive, but i dont think the trim and the rest of the roor rack will survive it.
nipper
#3
Posted 27 September 2005 - 08:45 PM
#4
Posted 27 September 2005 - 09:35 PM
Says that in two places actually.
Why not just have it stick out the back of the car ?
#5
Posted 27 September 2005 - 10:18 PM
Why not just have it stick out the back of the car ?
I think there'd be atleast 16' to 18' still hanging out the back if he tried to put it in the car.
#6
Posted 27 September 2005 - 10:22 PM
nipper
#7
Posted 27 September 2005 - 11:07 PM
We have access to a pickup, but it doesn't have a ladder rack... not sure how else a pickup with an eight foot bed would haul a 24 foot piece of lumber... we also have a big cargo van at work I've used for 14 foot lumber.
Thanks for the feedback, probably I'll pass on doing this, but if I do I'll be sure to take pictures!
Steve
#8
Posted 27 September 2005 - 11:12 PM
#9
Posted 27 September 2005 - 11:39 PM
Does that thing even have a roof?
nipper
#10
Posted 28 September 2005 - 12:05 AM
Thule spec is 165lbs, which is BS.... i've had well over 300lbs on my racks before and they held fine (loaded up box, 2 touring kayaks & 2 bikes)... there may be some marks where the feet used to be.. but it held. Although i am having issues with the racks now.. ie: having to hold the feet on the car by rachet strapping them together across the car
Factory racks always scare me...
#11
Posted 28 September 2005 - 12:10 AM
HAHAHA
Does that thing even have a roof?
nipper
Nope... you dont notice the 2x4 uprights extending up to hold the cord of wood in there?
#12
Posted 28 September 2005 - 09:21 AM
Andyjo:
Good point, it's Yakima cross bars on the factory rack. The Yakima rack itself should handle the weight IMO, but the Subaru's rack itelf, I dunno. I was also a bit worried about the leverage exerted by that much weight hanging fore and aft of the rack if I go through any dips in the road. Sort of a see-saw effect.
Steve
#13
Posted 28 September 2005 - 08:04 PM
PS: the 58 inch load bars have been great for extra-wide loads; never realized how useful they'd be. I have caught my head on them a few times (ouch).
Cardy 1/2 MD
(done with Pediatrics and Psychiatry- have noticed a lot of docs own SUBS!)
#14
Posted 30 September 2005 - 03:32 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











