Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
![]() |
Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created. We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning ** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it! Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998! |
K&N drop in filter
#1
Posted 24 October 2005 - 02:22 PM
#2
Posted 24 October 2005 - 02:28 PM
They are even better when you find them in the Boneyard, for 3 bucks..Hey, just a little heads up/review of a K&N drop in filter for my 03 LL Bean Outback H6. First off, the fit is not as good as stock but with some good 4 letter words it will go in. The lips of the filters seems a little stiff and the cover hard to get back on correctly but like I said, some patience and cuss words will git er done. Now, can I tell a difference for $45? A little bit. Its just a tad more responsive all over but nothing to get excited about. Is it worth the quadruple price tag? Depends on your wallet. I give it a 3 outa 5 rating.
I will say the one in my 93 Legacy was a little loose in the airbox. Same results..Not much difference if at all.
#3
Posted 24 October 2005 - 02:33 PM
#4
Posted 24 October 2005 - 03:49 PM
#5
Posted 24 October 2005 - 05:34 PM
i have learned....
OEM is much better for the car
BREATHES better and filters better
that oily rag collecting dust and grime isnt helping you much in the long run
OEM for me from now on
Jamie
#6
Posted 25 October 2005 - 10:01 AM
OEM is much better for the car
BREATHES better and filters better
that oily rag collecting dust and grime isnt helping you much in the long run
OEM for me from now on
I have an interest in this because I thought that I was doing the right thing by installing K&N filters in all 4 of my cars......
This OEM/K&N debate has been going on for some time and I have yet to see a definitive answer as to whether or not there is a problem with K&N filters. Just by visually comparing the two, it seems obvious (at least to me) that the K&N is less restrictive to airflow than the OEM so should "breathe" better. How is an "oily rag collecting dust and grime" any worse than a dry paper filter collecting dust and grime, as long as it stays in the filter? Isn't that what a filter is for? I suppose that you can't go wrong with OEM, but has anyone documented engine failure or premature wear as a result of running a K&N filter?
#7
Posted 25 October 2005 - 11:24 AM
I wouldn't run an oil mesh type filter off-road, I'd use paper. Just my two Euro-cents worth. I have a K&N.
#8
Posted 25 October 2005 - 11:57 AM
Personally, I used a K&N for over 250k in my recently totaled 1988 Saab 9000S. It used less than a half quart of oil between it’s annual oil changes (12-15k miles), didn't smoke ever and passed emissions tests every year without any preparation. This is a testament to Mobil 1, clean air coming in to the combustion chambers and those Swedes in Trollhatten assembling the engines.
Again, choose the one that lets you sleep at night. It doesn’t really matter that much in the real world. FYI - I do all of my own work on my cars. For me, I buy quality products that help reduce my maintenance costs and labor, without sacrificing MY perceived level of quality.
Jack
#9
Posted 25 October 2005 - 03:43 PM
I have used K&N for many years without problems.
#10
Posted 25 October 2005 - 04:58 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










