Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

12/96 EJ22 hydraulic or solid lifters? inteference or not?


Recommended Posts

checked my "1997" impreza and it's manufacture date stamp is 12/96, would that means it's hydraulic or solid lifters? really don't feel like pulling the covers just to find out.

 

also - would that mean it's an interference "1997" EJ22 or a non-interference "pre-1997" EJ22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about the lifters. Thought all the 2.2 were solid? According to what the people at Subaru.com told me you should have an non-interference motor. Of couse I have been told all sorts of conflicting stuff.

 

I think there are only two ways to find out out, one is not a pretty option...:eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe my dad's '97 Impreza was also manufactured in 1996. If it's a M.Y. 1997, my guess is that it has solid lifters. What does the air intake look like? Is there just a black tube that goes from the air cleaner into the intake manifold? If so, it's hydraulic, because the intake was also redesigned for the '97s.

 

If there's a big black box-shaped thing before the manifold and an extra "hook" of plastic tubing jutting diagonally out of the air hose, it's the newer, interference motor with solid lifters.

 

As a recap: ALL EJ22's from 1990-1996 are hydraulic lifters, and non-interference. EJ22s from 1997 onward are solid lifters and interference. Period.

 

Brian M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cool, thanks! i didnt' know about the intake differences.

As a recap: ALL EJ22's from 1990-1996 are hydraulic lifters, and non-interference. EJ22s from 1997 onward are solid lifters and interference. Period.

that's the problem, i knew that! mine being a "1997" model, but 12/96 manufacture date i wasn't sure. i had always assumed it was a 1997 with interference and solid lifters. wanted to know for sure. i'll check the intake differences, i can't remember off the top of my head. the extra box and hook thing you mentioned sounds like mine....which would be 97+ interference design, which is what i had thought all along. we've come full circle... sometimes the longest way 'round is the shortest way home.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...