Jump to content


Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!

Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.

We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
  • Say hello and join the conversation
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Classifieds with all sorts of Subaru goodies
  • Photo hosting in our gallery
  • Meet other cool people with cool cars
Seriously, what are you waiting for? Make your life more fulfilling and join today! You and your Subaru won't regret it, we guarantee** it.

* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!

Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!

Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Timing Belt Change Intervals


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Richard1296

Richard1296

    USMB Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 109 posts
  • L

Posted 11 October 2006 - 06:14 PM

I recently bought a second Subaru. My 90 Legacy's manual says to
replace the timing belt at 60K miles. My 2000 OBS calls for 105K
before replacing the belt. They are both 2.2 engines, I assume
the same engine. Were there changes made by Subaru, improvments
in belt technonlgy...or whats the reason for the major increase in
mileage before changing belts. What I'm getting to is they are both
the same engine so do I really neeed to do the 90 Legacy at 60K.
I know what the owners manual says,I just wonder what changed.

Richard

#2 Manarius

Manarius

    1995 Subaru SVX LSi

  • Members
  • 1,609 posts
  • Grantham

Posted 11 October 2006 - 08:02 PM

I'd do the 2000 OBS sooner than 105k. They're assuming that the tech changed to make the belts last longer.

The 90 won't care if you don't change the belt. It'll just break and that's that. If the 2000's breaks, you could potentially have some major issues that would require engine replacement.


#3 ferret

ferret

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 669 posts
  • Northern NJ

Posted 11 October 2006 - 08:38 PM

Starting in 97, all belts went to 105K. Different belt, different materials, unless you have the STI, that belt stays at 60K due to it's materials and tighter timing specs.

Before 97, many Calif spec belts, once again a different p/n, were 90K or 105K. Calif made that manditory so all mfgr's had to step up to that spec.

No reason you can't put the Calif spec belt on an older Subaru ( 90-96 ).

#4 porcupine73

porcupine73

    Obligate carnivore

  • Members
  • 4,967 posts
  • Buffalo, NY

Posted 11 October 2006 - 08:51 PM

It's the belt. I have a '96 legacy and '00obw and examining the timing belts side by side they are definitely different material or technology or whatever. Maybe the newer belts include kevlar or something to make them sturdier. On the ~'96 and earlier 2.2's the only risk of breaking a belt is being stranded, but after that and on the 2.5's you're going to most likely have to replace bent valves and maybe event dented pistons if that belt breaks.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users