Tex Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 theres a 1988 Subaru RX Turbo for sale near me for very cheap, under 1000. what can anyone tell me about this car, specs, problems, etc? what kinda mods can be done? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnW Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Did you try the search engine at all? Use this keyword, besides the obvious ones like RX, etc... Subarutex, Dr Rx. This is a big one that SubaruTex put up. http://usmb.ultimatesubaru.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6093&highlight=subarutex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 in fact i did, rx is too short a term to search for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 i was looking more towards the stock specifications, i cant find them anywhere on the web. thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnW Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 I always forget about the 2 letter block. The RX has a stiffer suspension than the regular GL. 5 speed manual trans with center differential lock and a limited slip rear differential. 3.70 final drive. Body kit gets you some molding on the bottom and an air dam for the front along with a spoiler on the rear deck lid. Seats have a cool checkerboard pattern and are very stiff. I believe they usually have the height adjust lever on the side. Engine is the regular ea82 turbocharged engine with around 115 HP. The newer the ea82 you can find the better as these have "gen3" heads and were less prone to cracking. As you can see in the post I linked people have intercooled them and added hoodscoops. Lately, lots of 5 bolt hub conversions on these as the 4 bolt 140MM wheel pattern doesnt give you many sporty options and the standard hubcaps are usually tossed due to being somewhat ugly. If its $1000 and not rusty its definately worth a pursuit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 is it more of a sportier subaru in the coupe form? what stock weights? what 0-60 type times can one get with the manual tranny? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnW Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 In 85 and 86 they had a 4dr sedan and past that they were all "3 door" coupe models with the liftback gate. These aren't really known for their 0-60 track times IMO as they are fairly heavy. Like any Subaru they are known for the traction mixed with a good engine that gives you a fun car to drive on twisty roads with minimal traction. Some guys in the PNW area are running them in Rallycross and doing quite well...in fact all of the Subaru's up there are doing quite well. With primary power going to the front with the 4wd off, and 4wd engaging the REAR wheels....the Subaru's excel at the fun stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawnW Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 I believe these weigh around 2800 pounds and with 115 HP that isn't terribly amazing. But the transmission in the RX is the nicest one to have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 i see, thanks very helpful. im looking for more of a pocket rocket rather than a offroad car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qman Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Shawn and Tex, the 4dr model exsisted through 1988. Then they were Fulltime 4WD GL10's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subarutex Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 this, i do believe, is the weirdest thread i've ever read. I keep thinking "thats not me, i'm not looking to buy another RX yet..." This is bound to get confusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Do It Sidewayz Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 not only did they come with the Gen 3 heads. but they also came with the best cams. The earlier turbo motors were really a dog. they had a cam in them that wasn't much good after about 5,000 rpms. The cams in the RX motor will pull all the way to about 7,000 rpm and keep going. A much better motor than the earlier EA82 turbo motors. Personally what is more desireable to me is an RX Sedan. They has all the normal RX goodies, but weighed less (about 150 lbs) due to no big rear glass hatch. Were stiffer in the rear, and had a near pefect weight distribution. the sedans are a much more "neutral car" than the coupes. None the less. Pick the thing up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 lol i didnt realize there was already a tex on this board, i use the name on my porsche board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 whats the condition on this? does it run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. RX Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 This is all pretty interesting, most of what Shawn has said is correct, what Qman added about the sedans is also correct. But is all my research, I have run across nothing that says that they have a different cam then any other turbo EA82, my parts book that covers from 85 to 90 show that exact same part number for the RX cam as all other cams in model years 87 through 90, the 85 and 86 turbos used that same cam as the carb engine. So there is a break betwee 86 and 87, but not because it is a RX. So, you haven't said is this car a coupe (3dr) or sedan (4dr)? The sedan had less aero kit stuff on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Do It Sidewayz Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 actually i think you are right. The 87 and newer motors did have the better cams. there is a huge difference in performance between the 2. If you've driven a 87 or later EA82 Turbo you will feel the difference. It will really rev 7,000 without protest, and still make plenty of power. The other cams just frankly suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skip Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Tex, one thing about the tranny that has not been mentioned and is rather unique - it's basicly a 10 speed! The hi/low range can be shifted up or down at speed, it not a true LOW range, more like half a gear. and you ask about mods well with a boost control valve and some other "tweaks" they can be made to keep up with traffic. my EA82T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meeky Moose Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 and if ya want a pocket rocket, my rx sedan outran a 2.2 impreza so now i know about the cams, thats why mine feels "gutless" after 5k rpm's.. time for a new motor, need more power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 what kind of horsepower are you producing? I know the stock is around 115. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meeky Moose Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 mines all stock as far as i can tell.. running the normal 8psi of boost.. and i still outran him with a slippin clutch.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.