Jump to content


Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!

Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.

We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
  • Say hello and join the conversation
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Classifieds with all sorts of Subaru goodies
  • Photo hosting in our gallery
  • Meet other cool people with cool cars
Seriously, what are you waiting for? Make your life more fulfilling and join today! You and your Subaru won't regret it, we guarantee** it.

* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!

Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!

Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Good Year Sava Snows any good?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 20 November 2007 - 05:13 PM

Just got off the phone with my tire guy and he had some interesting info.

He tried to steer me away fro the Nokian WR but when hard pressed he didn't have any real experience with them. He said I could buy a set and try them.

The reason most people find snow tires mushy feeling (especially the blisaks)is that they don't get the H rated ones, which are of course more expensive.

He also recommended Good year sava tires, which he said were in the same league as Blisak Michelin the dunlop and Nokian rsi.

Am I on to something here? These are almost half the price of the rest of the top rated tires.

#2 Rooster2

Rooster2

    Subaru Master

  • Members
  • 3,547 posts
  • Indianapolis

Posted 20 November 2007 - 09:06 PM

I can't speak about any knowledge of that Good Year tire. However, over the years, I have purchased Good Year tires, or bought a car used with Good Years. Over time, I developed the opinion that Good Years are slightly over priced, don't perform any better than average, and don't offer good tire wear. I don't evern consider them when time to buy tires.

For good performance at reasonable cost, I buy Kuhmo tires.

#3 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 20 November 2007 - 10:06 PM

I can't speak about any knowledge of that Good Year tire. However, over the years, I have purchased Good Year tires, or bought a car used with Good Years. Over time, I developed the opinion that Good Years are slightly over priced, don't perform any better than average, and don't offer good tire wear. I don't evern consider them when time to buy tires.

For good performance at reasonable cost, I buy Kuhmo tires.


I agree that kuhmo tires are value leaders but. The Good Year Sava Snow tires are ranked up with tires that are nearly twice the price. So that shoots down your performance and your price arguments.
And they are an anomaly in they are made in Slovenia, which is where the original Sava brand came from.
http://www.sava-tyres.com/eng.htm

#4 RallyKeith

RallyKeith

    Got Subaru(s)?

  • Members
  • 1,481 posts
  • Reading, Pa

Posted 21 November 2007 - 12:50 PM

From what I can tell Sava is a brand Goodyear bought out, and you are looking at the Eskimo S3 tire. I agree with Rooster2 about goodyear, but these tires are not really goodyear, they are Sava tires. Sava just happens to be owned by Goodyear. It would be like me saying I'm going to buy GM 9-3, which is not a GM but a Saab. I've owned several sets of Hakkapaliittas. They are great tires in the snow and ice down to the last few 32nds of tread depth. It's all about sacrafice when dealing with tires. NOBODY makes a tire that excels in EVRY catagory. To get good ice traction you will have to put up with some squishyness on dry pavement. A tire that does well in the snow will not have superb traction on just wet pavement. Just like a tire that has excellent traction on hot dry pavement will have horrible peformance on anything cold, and anything desinged to work in the cold will wear very quickly in the heat. Things have gotten better over the years to bring these gaps closer together, but there are still comprimises to be made.

Several people I've talked to have said the Hakka WR is a great comprimise of summer driving and tread life, and winter snow and ice performance. My best friend's father has them on a giant RWD BMW and commutes some 80 miles a day with them, summer and winter. So far tread wear has been good and winter performance has been excelent. I would recommend them to anyone looking for an all year tire.

As for the Eskimo S3, it looks like it would be a decent winter tire. If they are really cheap I would give them a try. It has all the right things to do well. Open tread pattern, lots of sipes, and directional tread pattern.

If you get them let us know how they are.

Keith

#5 thatswhatshesaid

thatswhatshesaid

    Subaphilia

  • Gold Subscribers
  • 736 posts
  • Spokane, WA

Posted 21 November 2007 - 02:15 PM

Reviews seem to look good...if you can find them in English!:lol:

Anyway, they look like a good compromise between winter traction and dry-pavement driveability. Plus there's no stud hummmmmmmm to worry about.

Give 'em a try and let us know!!!!

#6 rverdoold

rverdoold

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 638 posts
  • Netherlands

Posted 21 November 2007 - 05:52 PM

Dunno who is owning the brand but slovenia is nearby here (well relative), anyway.

I got the Sava Eskimo3 (who makes these names) and they got tested by the German ADAC for road safety as the better cheap winter tyres. Since winter tires are obligatory in germany i have to have them while even going there for shopping.

http://www.adac.de/T...cePageID=163625

Its in german though but:
Trocken = dry surface road
Nass = wet surface road
Schnee = snow on road
Eis = iced surface road
Gerausch = tire noise
Rollwiderstand = roll resistance
Verschleiss = wear resistance
Sehr empfehelenswert = Highly recommended
empfehelenswert = recommended
bedingt empfehelenswert = not really recommended
nicht empfehelenswert = dont even think of getting them
ok thats for the translation 0.1 is best 5.0 is worst

Some others:
http://www.adac.de/T...cePageID=195661
http://www.adac.de/T...cePageID=127155

#7 rverdoold

rverdoold

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 638 posts
  • Netherlands

Posted 21 November 2007 - 05:54 PM

Reviews seem to look good...if you can find them in English!:lol:

Anyway, they look like a good compromise between winter traction and dry-pavement driveability. Plus there's no stud hummmmmmmm to worry about.

Give 'em a try and let us know!!!!


If you need translation from German, Dutch, Dannish i can help.
Have the S3 for the 2nd season now and they were very good for the price they costed.

#8 Olnick

Olnick

    Ol' Subaru Guy

  • Members
  • 2,559 posts
  • Honolulu HI

Posted 21 November 2007 - 11:42 PM

Dang, we are a worldly bunch aren't we? I love it!

Thanks rverdoold.

#9 rverdoold

rverdoold

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 638 posts
  • Netherlands

Posted 22 November 2007 - 02:03 AM

Dang, we are a worldly bunch aren't we? I love it!

Thanks rverdoold.


Thats whats makes this message board so nice. There are people around the world willing to help others.
(the dutch subaru board only has people who are not good in communication) This is just a great board.

The problem with winter or snow tires is that they perform really bad on wet surfaces. This seems very strange to me because the rubber compound is much softer than summer tires. I have driven several rental cars with the cheapest winter tires which were a complete pain to drive when it was raining (ok maybe not that dangerous but still dont like on every pulling away the wheels skid)

#10 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 23 November 2007 - 07:37 AM

Give 'em a try and let us know!!!!

Well Looks like We're getting the Eskimos. Had to have them after hearing the name :-) They should get installed sometime next week.

One Question. Apparently the 16" steel rims with a 55 mm offset are unavailable.
I am told that a 16 inch rim with a 50 mm offset will work.
Any thoughts on this?

#11 rverdoold

rverdoold

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 638 posts
  • Netherlands

Posted 23 November 2007 - 07:52 AM

Give 'em a try and let us know!!!!

Well Looks like We're getting the Eskimos. Had to have them after hearing the name :-) They should get installed sometime next week.

One Question. Apparently the 16" steel rims with a 55 mm offset are unavailable.
I am told that a 16 inch rim with a 50 mm offset will work.
Any thoughts on this?


Might be, what is the normal tire size you have now 205/55 R16???
Because you might go to a smaller tire like the 195/60 R16 or the 185/65 R16 if they fit on the rim. Usually >205 tires are cheaper as well.
check:
http://www.1010tires...eCalculator.asp

#12 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 23 November 2007 - 08:05 AM

[quote name='rverdoold']Might be, what is the normal tire size you have now 205/55 R16???

Yes they are normally 205/55 R16. I'm getting 205/55 H16 Eskimo's.
By my calculations the wheel base will be 2/5 of an inch wider than before.

I also discussed the downsizing theory with My tire guy and he suggested that with the new Silica compounds you get better traction on ice with more tread.
So the better ice traction equals out the decreased snow performance.

Just concerned with the offset of 50 vs 55.
He also said that is what most people get even though they think they're getting a 55 mm offset.

He told me that if I were to go to the dealer for the rims to be sure to have them prove the offset.

Thanks for all your great replies by the way!

#13 fnlyfnd

fnlyfnd

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 748 posts
  • Buffalo, NY

Posted 23 November 2007 - 12:26 PM

offset is a big deal because of suspension clearance or caliper clearance. A search on this board will yield some good info, also cars101.com has a offset chart for all years of subaru IIRC.

EDIT: http://www.cars101.c...sandwheels.html

Hope this helps

#14 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 24 November 2007 - 09:37 AM

offset is a big deal because of suspension clearance or caliper clearance. A search on this board will yield some good info, also cars101.com has a offset chart for all years of subaru IIRC.

EDIT: http://www.cars101.c...sandwheels.html

Hope this helps


I found this Chart that says 50mm offset or higher is OK.

http://wac.addr.com/...obs/wheels.html

#15 bigjim5551212

bigjim5551212

    USMB is life!

  • Members
  • 191 posts
  • Vancouver Canada

Posted 24 November 2007 - 08:22 PM

The Nokian WR is very popular in Western Canada.... It is an all season tire that is good for snow. It is different than Blizzak or other snows. I put on the Bridgestone G009. Pretty good so far... have not seen the snow yet.

#16 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 04 December 2007 - 10:22 AM

As for the Eskimo S3, it looks like it would be a decent winter tire. If they are really cheap I would give them a try. It has all the right things to do well. Open tread pattern, lots of sipes, and directional tread pattern.

If you get them let us know how they are.Keith


Got them on this morning! 16/55/205 Sava Eskimo S3 on 16/7 inch steel wheels 50 mm offset.
Driving home with them gave me a very good first impression.
Ride is much smoother than the brigestones.
Handling is very good!
Fan like "wrrr" when churning through slush or water.:burnout: .
Reasonably quiet when dry.

Were predictable on the highway during lane changes crossing frozen slush. -4c

I was curious to see how a 91 load rating compared to an 87 load rating
tire?
The car feels taller, more solid, which I attribute to a change in load rating and or in wheel offset and rim thickness. Or is it just the much smoother ride that I'm feeling from these new tires?

#17 rverdoold

rverdoold

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 638 posts
  • Netherlands

Posted 04 December 2007 - 04:33 PM

Same here, on snow surface they are fine and have good grip. On dry roads (where mostly use them) the noise is less than my summer tires which are 205/55 on 16 while these are 185/65 on 15. Never had aquaplaning with them on water filled streams on the road (those ones made by trucks). THey are very good, especially compared to the price.


Still they are in no comparisson to the Pirelli Spikes i had on the rental car in Latvia :grin: 15mm spikes eating into the ice/snow (uhm and asphalt:lol: ) (thinks something that its a rental car anyway)

#18 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 05 February 2008 - 04:36 PM

As for the Eskimo S3, it looks like it would be a decent winter tire. If they are really cheap I would give them a try. It has all the right things to do well. Open tread pattern, lots of sipes, and directional tread pattern.

If you get them let us know how they are.Keith


Got them on this morning! 16/55/205 Sava Eskimo S3 on 16/7 inch steel wheels 50 mm offset.
Driving home with them gave me a very good first impression.
Ride is much smoother than the brigestones.
Handling is very good!
Fan like "wrrr" when churning through slush or water.:burnout: .
Reasonably quiet when dry.

Were predictable on the highway during lane changes crossing frozen slush. -4c

I was curious to see how a 91 load rating compared to an 87 load rating
tire?
The car feels taller, more solid, which I attribute to a change in load rating and or in wheel offset and rim thickness. Or is it just the much smoother ride that I'm feeling from these new tires?





Effortlessly crawls through 1 foot snowy unplowed roads! Forward and in reverse.
Wide footprint.
Higher load index means that you don't really need to pump them up as much.
Amazing with slush and wet.:burnout:

These tires are good on cold dry highway, they have amazing stopping power, Like bigger brakes!

To the point that you have got to be careful that you don't out stop the guy behind you.


I always rebalance before I reinstall winter tires again for the winer, because they have very soft rubber.
Too bad they have to come off after + 6 c

#19 Setright

Setright

    Elite Master of the Subaru

  • Members
  • 3,176 posts
  • Denmark

Posted 06 February 2008 - 05:25 AM

For a few years I have sworn to using Bridgestone winter tyres, but Continental TS810 has surpassed them.

Had these on a Forester 2.5XT last year...so much grip it was hard to get it to slide...on packed snow.

I've got a set on my Impreza 2.0 now and they still impress me. If you look closely at the tests you'll notice TS810 is the best for stopping hard in wet conditions -but they move them to 2nd and 3rd place because of wear and fuel consumption.
To me, that's daft. Over here the big discussion every winter is the longer braking distance of winter tyres in rain....then someone addresse the problem and makes a tyre that grips in wet and snow. And the testers almost ignore it.

Conti's for me ;)

#20 rverdoold

rverdoold

    Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 638 posts
  • Netherlands

Posted 06 February 2008 - 05:34 AM

Whats the difference in price then with the conti's and the Sava's cause that is usually the issue.

#21 Setright

Setright

    Elite Master of the Subaru

  • Members
  • 3,176 posts
  • Denmark

Posted 06 February 2008 - 07:01 AM

COuld be.

Of course, when it comes to tyres I don't like to pinch the pennies. Tyres are the most important component on the car.

Yes, yes, I know lot's of people are more interested in getting 50K miles out of a set of tyres.....but I care about grip.

#22 subaruplatt

subaruplatt

    Eat, Live, Breath Subaru

  • Members
  • 320 posts
  • Toronto

Posted 06 February 2008 - 07:51 AM

For a few years I have sworn to using Bridgestone winter tyres, but Continental TS810 has surpassed them.

Had these on a Forester 2.5XT last year...so much grip it was hard to get it to slide...on packed snow.

I've got a set on my Impreza 2.0 now and they still impress me. If you look closely at the tests you'll notice TS810 is the best for stopping hard in wet conditions -but they move them to 2nd and 3rd place because of wear and fuel consumption.
To me, that's daft. Over here the big discussion every winter is the longer braking distance of winter tyres in rain....then someone addresse the problem and makes a tyre that grips in wet and snow. And the testers almost ignore it.

Conti's for me ;)

ContiWinterContact+TS810 appear to be excellent according to tire rack.
I would guess that they cost at least twice what the Eskimos cost.
So many great winter tire to choose from.:clap:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users