Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
|Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.
We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!
Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!
hey guys.. check this out
Posted 11 February 2008 - 12:58 AM
they already tested on a 2000 legacy
i requested a quote on the HAFC for my 95 lets see how much will it cost
Posted 11 February 2008 - 02:30 AM
Posted 11 February 2008 - 03:01 AM
Why on earth if it is true the convernment is not giving these things away????? Cause every country has trouble passing the CO2 emmsion limits.
Posted 11 February 2008 - 08:19 AM
thats all i got to say about that
they are bad christians.........
Posted 11 February 2008 - 08:19 AM
For the sake of argument, let's assume that the HAFC could actually deliver 50% increase in gas mileage. If you travel 10,000 miles per year, and are getting 20 mpg, a 50% increase would raise that to 30 mpg. At $3 per gallon, 10k miles would cost $1500 in gas at 20 mpg, and $1000 at 30 mpg. That would theoretically yield a savings of $500 per year...
...but then you'd have to subtract the cost of the "conditioner" plus xylene and acetone, another $125 for treating 320 gals (close enough to the 333 gals used per year at 30 mpg). That reduces annual savings to $375 in my example.
However, the HAFC costs about $1000, and to get the guaranteed results has to be installed by a licensed mechanic, and "tuned". To make the math easy, let's say the charge for that work is only $125, for a total outlay of $1125. "Saving" $375 per year, it would take three years to break even on a cost of $1125.
So, in my example, only after three years would you actually begin to see any financial benefit -- if the device actually worked, and lasted that long.
Posted 11 February 2008 - 10:20 AM
"...When they shut off the engine, the researchers reported that it coasted on the plasma for another two minutes."
Posted 11 February 2008 - 10:21 AM
Posted 11 February 2008 - 10:38 AM
yeah but i may be worth for someone like me that drives 30K plus miles per year
Unless it destroys your engine. Not saying it would, but hard to say it wouldn't. especially if it diesels for two minutes every time your shut it off.
On the other hand, nothing ventured...
Posted 11 February 2008 - 11:33 AM
THIS GAS SAVER THING
IS A HOAX, NOT REAL
BIG FREAKING SCAM
I AM PART OF A WATCHDOG GROUP
AND THIS PERTICULAR ITEM HAS BEEN
ON OR NEAR THE TOP OF OUR LIST
FOR OVER 10 YEARS
THE IDEAS ARE 30+ YEARS OLD
I WOULD SUGGEST TO ALL TO READ ABOUT
DENNIS LEE, AND AVOID THIS PRODUCT
IF YOU WANT BETTER GAS MILAGE
KEEP YOUR CAR PROPERLY TUNED
AND KEEP YOUR LEADFOOT OF THE GO PEDAL
OR AT LEAST NOT PEDAL TO THE METAL
I GET 28MPG FROM MY 67 BUICK 300V-8(2BBL)
AND THATS CITY
Posted 11 February 2008 - 12:47 PM
WOW ! They've actually managed to change the size of the molecules with magnets!!
Posted 11 February 2008 - 12:55 PM
Is that like a flux capacitor?
Uh no. Actually, it's more like a FART capacitor. It puts the inherent power of your farts to work for you!!!
Posted 11 February 2008 - 01:24 PM
good post man. im not sure everybody read it
i've read it.. i'm just curious how is it!
it all seems too good to be true
lets see if they respond
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users