Mbrooks

You are sadly mistaken. I have had my trans fluid changed at the most miles at 30K. I have been through 3 trans rebuilds, all will lackluster results. The v6 Explorer transmissions are anemic, and weak at best. The transmission is by far the weakest link, and most common serious mechanical problem Explorers have. And yes, I really love my pushrod.

I wanted the Outback because they look better than the Legacy. I'd keep my Explorer until it rotted into the groud, except that I can't keep transmissions in it. I went to the stealership, and was not impressed. All of the pre 2000 motors sounded like complete junk. I can't see dropping over 10K on something that sounds like it's about to die. A 2000 is out of my budget at the moment, so I guess I will looking for a different vehicle. Thanks for all the help.

I live in Erie. My friend had a Subaru(1996 Legacy) that he liked. Ot had 80K on it when it was totalled in an accident. Before he was in the accident he said he had been noticing trans problems with the automatic. Tires aren't much of a concern for me as i am very picky, and will be doing some tire shopping shortly after I purchase the vehicle. I'm not sure I can afford the '00 with the kind of mileage I am looking for. I will be visiting the Subaru dealer this week, so we will see I guess.

First off, I'd like to say this is a nice forum setup you have here. :wave: I am currently looking for another vehicle to replace my Ford Explorer. I am considering buying an Outback wagon. I assume I will be looking in the 97-00 year range, depending on what the dealership has, and for how much $$$. I am looking to get an automatic. I was wondering what to lookout for/avoid? What are the weak points, and things that break/fail more often? I most of the repair and maintainence myself, is the Subaru a nightmare to work on? Any irregular maintainence except for the waterpump/timing belt? Thanks in advance.