WJM Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 So I looked up the weights of the engines... EA82T vs EJ205/EJ25x series EA82T shortblock is 45.5 lbs. All the EJxxx engines I looked up are listed as 110.0 lbs. Hmmm...thats a GAIN of 64 lbs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted February 24, 2005 Author Share Posted February 24, 2005 WHOLE engines... EJ205 (WRX) is 350 lbs. EA82 is not listed as ever avalible as a complete engine assy or long block. :-\ My guess it about 100~150 lbs less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
85Sub4WD Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 OMG - well no EJ conversion for me - that is a bit much weight for me to add to my front end and expect decent handeling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archemitis Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 OMG - well no EJ conversion for me - that is a bit much weight for me to add to my front end and expect decent handeling its realy not that big of a deal. with my er27, compared to the old ea81, i cant tell the difference, cept it plows through snow better now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I wonder why it weighs so much more thou? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted February 24, 2005 Author Share Posted February 24, 2005 the blcok deisgn...and there is alot more material in the block over the EA82. Speaking of ER27....69.2 LBS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorganM Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Good triva knowledge but I wouldnt base many decisions or assumptions on short block weights; or even weight of long blocks. Quite alot of extra junk on a full engine assembly vs. a long or short block. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted February 24, 2005 Author Share Posted February 24, 2005 its not an assumption, its FACT right from SUBARU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorganM Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 its not an assumption, its FACT right from SUBARU. That is NOT what I said. I said I wouldnt base any assumptions on the facts you posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted February 24, 2005 Author Share Posted February 24, 2005 oh, i get it now. :-p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.