Pelle

Did either of you figure it out? I have the same issue.

So, from what I can tell, both 2.2/2.5 are good, just 2.2 is more bulletproof and preferable. Unless the seller has documentation that the timing belt and head gasket were replaced around the 100k mark, I should expect to replace them myself, just to take no chances with them failing. Tight turns to check the awd torque bind and decent test drive to heat up engine and check for leaks, besides all the usual common sense stuff when purchasing a used car. Thanks for the help and advice.

Hey, first time caller, long time listener. I'm looking to purchase a used Subaru, probably around 1995-2000ish, I only have about 4-5k to spend. I've been reading a lot on the USMB to figure out what's best to buy but I'm still confused. Should I steer clear of all 2.5l and only go with 2.2, and is that because of the total destruction a head gasket failure would cause? Would a manual transmission be better then auto with cars this old? Is there any model/year that is just all around bad and I should avoid? It will most likely be an Outback since I'm in Colorado and they are plentiful on the used market. Any help will be most appreciated, thanks.