Denny
-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by Denny
-
-
Quote from EdmondsActually the engine has very little to do with mpg.It is more about wind resistance, drag, weight, gears, etc.
What's New for 2005
"The base engine is enhanced this year with electronic throttle control, and a new four-speed automatic transmission is available. An air filtration system is now standard on all Foresters. Also new this year is the 2.5 XS L.L. Bean Edition, which includes a myriad of interior and exterior trim enhancements, rugged cargo area trim and a self-leveling rear suspension."
I cannot see anything other than what is listed as a reason for improvement in fuel economy of the 2005 model vs 2004.
Are you saying that the gear ratios have changed and curb weight reduced? And the 2005 model is more "slippery" than the 2004?
Just asking, as I really don't know.
Thanks.
Denny
-
The reason I am asking is that on the 2005 model, Subaru managed to do some minor tweaking on the engine to get a better mpg figure than the previous years.
Just wondering what is happening in the real world.
Thanks for the responses and keep them coming!
Denny
-
Hi Group,
Anyone with the 2005 Forester with the N/A engine and manual trans get the claimed 30 mpg on the highway?
Thanks
Denny
Subaru Reliability vs Honda and Toyota
in 1990 to Present Legacy, Impreza, Outback, Forester, Baja, WRX&WrxSTI, SVX
Posted
Hi Group,
I seem to see quite a few posts on this site concerning warranty issues or problems on low mileage Subaru's, although Consumer Reports always gives a "thumbs up" concerning this issue.
Do you think Subes are just as reliabe as Honda's and Toyota's?
Im thinking of purchasing a 2005 Forester and this is one of my major concerns.
BTW, My 2002 Mazda Protege' 5 has given me no trouble at all.
Opinions?
Thanks
Denny