Jump to content


Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!

Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.

We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
  • Say hello and join the conversation
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Classifieds with all sorts of Subaru goodies
  • Photo hosting in our gallery
  • Meet other cool people with cool cars
Seriously, what are you waiting for? Make your life more fulfilling and join today! You and your Subaru won't regret it, we guarantee** it.

* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!

Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!

Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Replace Head Gasket or Replace Engine?


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 phoenix1125

phoenix1125

    New User

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Berkeley

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:14 PM

I recently bought a '98 Outback (2.5L DOHC) & am now faced with having to replace the HG. The car has about 100,000 miles on it & I'm hoping to drive it for another 100,000. I'm wondering whether it makes more sense to spend $1,000 on replacing the HG or $3,000 on replacing the engine with a rebuilt 2.2. I've read a lot of bad things about the 2.5's and am worried that if I replace the HG, I'm either going to blow another HG in the future or have other $1,000+ engine problems. Any words of wisdom in making this difficult decision?

Thanks,
Chris

#2 Meeky Moose

Meeky Moose

    Subaru Master

  • Members
  • 2,343 posts
  • Grants Pass

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:39 PM

2.2 is a easy swap, i say go with the 2.2 for reliability and peace of mind.. just my 2 cents.. btw.. i've done the 2.2 swap to my 99' outback.. very happy with it..

#3 Commuter

Commuter

    Subaru Master

  • Members
  • 1,857 posts
  • Niagara area, Ont Canada

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:58 PM

Not exactly words of wisdom, but I can relay some experience.

97 OB - Replaced headgaskets almost 3 years and 180,000 km ago. Still holding. (Note, block got replaced too, but that is another story IMHO.)

If you are going to keep the car for some time, I'd strongly recommend looking at a rebuilt engine from CCR Inc. You get a 3 yr warranty. They know how to keep the head gaskets from failing again. They mitigate (eliminate?) the piston slap issue. Etc. You would save about $1000 going the 2.2 route over the 2.5L.

Personally, I find these cars underpowered. They pull nicely, but acceleration sucks. I'm not a heavy foot person, and it seems that Subaru owners that buy these cars are quite tolerant of the given power. (See post above for example.) Personally, I wouldn't want to give up one little bit of hp in this vehicle. I keep hoping to find some not-to-expensive way to get 15 or 20 hp more out of mine!

Good luck. Sorry to hear of your troubles.

Commuter

#4 Scoobaroo

Scoobaroo

    USMB Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 96 posts

Posted 20 April 2005 - 07:27 PM

Not trying to steal the thread, but what is CCR doing to eliminate piston slap?

Select fit pistons?
Coatings?

Emily?

#5 The Dude

The Dude

    Certified Subaru Nut

  • Members
  • 800 posts
  • South Carolina

Posted 21 April 2005 - 06:44 AM

To me, it's a no brainer. Replace the headgaskets. You have a seven year old car with 100,000 miles on it. You want to to spend as little money as you can to keep the car working for as long as you can. I'll spare you my rebuilt engine horror story, but just let me say that rebuilt engines are NOT risk free either.You could replace the headgaskets one more time and still be up $1,0000 over a 2.2L engine transplant.
Some people might find the Legacy to be underpowered with the 2.2L powerplant. The 2.2L is a great little engine, but they break too, just no where as often as the 2.5L DOHC Phase I.

So, you spend $3,000 for a rebuilt 2.2L, and 6,0000 miles later the 4EAT
AT blows up. Now what?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users