frag Posted November 2, 2003 Share Posted November 2, 2003 I've been uneasy at times tinking about the very thin (in my opinion) Subaru AWD tolerance of 1/4 inch in tire circumference from front to back. Found it difficult to directly measure the tires circumference using a tape. You have to measure exactly at the same place on the tire, and be sure the tape goes straight around the tire, etc. This morning I went at a college parking lot, measured that 13 parking spaces were equivalent of about 20 tire revolutions. I put a chalk mark on front and rear tires at the point of road contact and proceeded to give them the 20 revs going in a straight line. If the tires circumferences had a difference of 1/4 inch or more I would find the marks 5 or more inches apart at the end of the experiment. They were nor more than 1 inch from each other relative to the tire's contact patch. My mind is now at ease: my viscous coupling is not in danger. I might try something else next time and measure what effect a difference in pressure does to the rolling radius of a tire. T'was to cold to add that to the experiment this morning. My contribution to car science :santa: Please, no Nobel prize necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theotherskip Posted November 2, 2003 Share Posted November 2, 2003 i think that the vc that is used in the manual has more give to this tolerance than the transfer clutches used in the automatic, hense the lack of a way to disable the AWD when using the spare. i just make sure that i keep them rotated and i wouldn't replace just one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.