Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

hogweed

Members
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    central Pa.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

hogweed's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (3/11)

18

Reputation

  1. i sold him the forester a couple years ago and i thought it had been a 98. he told me it was a 99 so i wanted to re check.
  2. i have the legacy GT trans and my friend has the 99 forester. we are trying to get his car fixed and wanted to know if the tranny from the GT will work in the forester. thank you all in advance for any and all help!
  3. it seems that when i ground that single wire off what i thought was the temp sending unit the oil light stays on. this sending unit is next to the crank sensor right behind the EJ22 stamp. i don't see another single-wire sending unit on the motor anywhere.edit: after reviewing \several more threads it seems the sensor i need is under the intake on the pass side. i unplugged it and the gauge went all the way up, as was suggested but fairfax....when i cleaned it and plugged it back in i now have a blinking CEL
  4. i will try that straight away....i switched out clusters with the same results so i suspect the gauge is ok. i just remembered we had to bypass the alarm under the dash so i'm beginning to think something was unplugged that shouldn't have been
  5. looked at it today and tried the connector theory. it seems to be secure and i pulled it off and reinstalled it a few times in case it was corroded which it didn't appear to be. checked all the fuses and eyeballed all the connectors......didn't try the fuel sender yet because of stuff in the cargo area that i didn't feel like moving today!
  6. finally have some time to check it out. i was going to put some more fuel in to see if the gauge would move but i found the filler neck had rusted through! i had one from the car the motor came out of that was good so i used it and now it should be fine to fill the tank. i'll check the connectors.... thank you
  7. hello, i finally got around to the swap and everything is working except the fuel and temp gauges. temp gauge was "working" at first but reading too low; now it doesn't move. i tried a different cluster and it's the same. any thoughts on this issue? thank you in advance! gregg
  8. i bought the 2000 impreza (lightly crashed, salvage certificate) a couple years ago. i fixed the damage but it has some more rust than i like and i have been undecided about going the rest of the way to get it titled again. i recently acquired a 2000 legacy outback with a seized 2.5 in it and thought i might be able to swap the 2.2 from the impreza into the legacy but i remember it gets a little more complicated as the years go up. any help/suggestions would be appropriated. both are 5 speed cars thank you gregg
  9. i have this 2000 impreza 2.2 5 speed i was going to fix but i think it may be too rusty, soooooooo i found a 2000 OBW 2.5 5 speed w/ a bad motor and i was thinking to use the 2.2. i read this will work....then i read it won't work....then it would work... will it work and anything i need to be aware of other than swapping the driver side sprockets? thx g
  10. thank you, fellas! ok, so i don't think the trans in the 98 is bad i just thought i'd solve the clutch issue that way....but i got to thinking that even if i just swap motors the clutch on the 99 comes out when i pull that motor and can still go into the 98! now the question is which is easier to do: engine and trans together or just swap engines? i have to think the engine swap is the way to go
  11. ok, i thought i had this figured out but i'm getting nervous! 2 outback wagons.... i have a 1999 30th anniversary obw 2.5 5 speed that's crashed but has a great drivetrain. i have another 1998 obw 2.5 5 speed that has a great body/int but has a bad engine. would this be a direct swap for engine and tranny? thanks in advance g
  12. yup....legacy is dohc!! thanks that motor will go into a 97 legacy 2.5 dohc thought correct?
×
×
  • Create New...