Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

subsince77

Members
  • Posts

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by subsince77

  1. We have a friend visiting from NM right now. She is looking for something to replace her aging SUV. We were driving between here and Crested Butte yesterday and she suddenly said, " there are so many Subarus here!" there are also a lot of Highlanders, Mazdas, Volvos, etc., but no comparison to the number of Subbies of every description. We are on our third, and every one has been great. I haven't had the 09 in any real snow yet, nor have I had any good tires on it yet. This is the first auto, and the first with the newer traction stuff. It will be interesting to compare come November.

  2. Just wondering if anyone else has had this problem, or knows a solution. I have an 09 Outback. I have noticed that I sometimes get electronic noise through the speakers. I first thought it was coming through my iPhone which was hooked up and being used as an iPod. But then I found that after disconnecting the iPhone, and even turning the sound system off, I was still getting the noise.

     

    It is the sound that you get sometimes when your cell phone is near a set of speakers or a radio and receiving data. I don't know how else to describe it. I have even gotten it when my phone was not in the car, so the system is picking it up some how.

     

    We live in a rural area, so not a big problem around here. But every time I go to a city, it is annoying. The car is on warranty until November. Is this something that should be looked at?

  3. 2009 OBW 2.5 AT- roof box on all the time. Locally, mix of town and slow rural roads 25.5, highway 28 to 29.5, best yet 31.5 one 160 miles of pretty flat road. All of our trips include mountains, and much of this has been in temps from below freezing to 50 degrees, no summer driving yet.

     

    One thing I have noticed is that the computer estimate on the dash is ALWAYS way off, at least two to three MPG. It lies on the high side. So if you are basing you milage on that thing, forget it.

  4. Thanks. Yes, the blue coolant is quite lovely. Matches the exterior paint.

     

    But I must say that I am a little disappointed that you guys can't mind-read the dealer and tell me if my car has already been treated. Quite disappointing. Guess I'll have to make a phone call.

     

    I don't seem to be able to get used to the fact that the car came from a dealer, there is a dealer involved, the car has a warranty, etc.

  5. My brother recently bought a 2002 Legacy Wagon. The dealership had just done a tune up and changed all the funds. When he looked in the coolant overflow, he could see some gray blobs. He asked about them and they said it was a system sealer that they had put in. He assumed that meant something that would potentially plug up the heater core, so he told them he wanted the coolant replaced. They did so.

     

    Today he and I were talking about the various HG problems that have affected various generations of Subarus. BTW, he is no dummy, he is a master BMW mechanic and has owned many Subarus. This is his first 2.5. Anyway, I was telling him about the second gens having the external, rather than internal problem, and about the HG conditioner from Subaru. He got wondering if that was what he was seeing, and wished that the dealer had explained it the way I did. He is going to check into it and be sure he has the conditioner.

     

    So my basic question is, if the conditioner had just been added, could you see it? Would it look like that? I have never seen the stuff.

     

    A related question, my 09 has the blue coolant. Would it have the conditioner already from Subaru, or is that something I need to get at some point?

  6. Hmmmm, interesting read, thanks for creating this thread. The MPG isn't too bad as long as once doesn't have leadfoot syndrome (which is why I've never managed any higher than 25-30 MPG).

     

    25 to 30 isn't bad considering all the advantages I get from this car, especially in the winter. I have always felt that I have plenty of passing and uphill power, so I'm happy with it. It was just when it was looking like I was going to struggle for 22 that I was concerned.

  7. Ok, I will stop flogging this thread now, this is my last post. My wife just got back from a 700+ mile trip. 300 miles of 65 to 70 mph highway, over some mountains, then rolling but slightly downhill - 100 miles of city driving - then 300 miles of rolling slightly uphill and back over the mountains on the way home.

     

    Over the entire trip, the 09 Outback averaged 28.7 mpg. Again, that was with 3 adults and luggage on board. So, I think that was great. Around town it only gets about 24, but this is very acceptable to me. I did run the 44K injector cleaner through it, and I changed the air filter, and put synthetics all the way around. But I think the biggest difference was just us learning how the car likes to be driven, as opposed to our 97 MT.

  8. Define NEW and define OLD. Ethanol can be a wild card, but depending upon how new it is it shouldnt be an issue.

     

    Newer outbacks are heavier then older outbacks hence the MPG difference between the two cars. Your driving habits from the old car may not bode well with the new car.

     

    Try staying at 65 as the tipping point for some subarus is 68 where the MPG drops.

     

    New is an 09, Old is the 97 I drove until three weeks ago. I had already seen the big drop in mpg due to ethanol on the 97. That whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Add 10% ethanol, lose at least 10% in milage ( I know people with 2010 vehicles that still lose that), use at least 10% more fuel, pay more at the pump and the grocery store....

     

    Anyway, I think the biggest difference was in trying to drive the auto the same way I have always driven the manuals. It has taken a thousand miles to get the feel of the car, and the new shift points. If you read through the thread, you can see the progression. It seems to be doing fine now.

     

    Also, yes, speed is a big deal. Both the 97 and this one seem to drop drastically right around 70, maybe before. most of our driving around here is at lower speeds though.

  9. My wife took the car on a 320 mile road trip today. The first 165 miles is up over one pass then fairly flat to slightly downhill. The roads are mostly 65 to 70 mph. They may have had a slight tail wind, I'm not sure, but she got 31.48 mpg. This was with three adults and luggage.

     

    So all is well with the car. It doesn't do quite as well around town, but the same or slightly better on the road. Good enough:banana:

  10. My last two fillups were better. A 28.8, and a 25 something. The two averaged out to 26.9. That was a combination of highway miles with climbs and descents, and around town.

     

    Three changes have been made. First I am getting more used to the gearing on the car, and I think I am simply driving it better.

     

    Second, I took off the roof top box for a week or two. That doesn't affect my comparisons to my old car because it always had the same box on it. Also, on the old car the roof top box made exacty 1 mile per gallon difference.

     

    Third, I ran a bottle of BG 44K through it.

     

    I suspect that my driving habits are making the biggest difference. In a couple of weeks when I put the box back on, I will see if I lose 4 mpg. If so it just rides differently and catches more air on this car.

  11. Yeah... I didn't realize this at first, and thought that EA82's and EA81's just got much better mileage than EJ22's and newer.... but on the highway they are about the same even though the newer ones are lower in the mountains. It's just that you can go so much faster in the mountains with the EJ22's (and proportionately faster with the new EJ25's) that you use more gas because of that, I think. When I drive my older cars I realize that I have gotten used to going at highway speeds up hills now.... which never used to happen :)

     

    Exactly. I started out crawling up hills with a VW bug, 40 hp, later 60 hp, but always making sure to keep it reved up and cool. We moved to the 77 Subaru DL, very slow but a great car, a 1.8 liter Isuzu Trooper. That poor thing couldn't hold 55 on flat ground in a head wind. Even our 1985 Nissan pickup went up passes in second.

     

    The 97 Outback flew from my perspective. For the first time I could actually pass people without risking my life. It was a revelation. That's why when people complain about the power in these cars I know they are coming from a different world than I did. This car has plenty of power for me. But, the gearing is very different than what I have been driving for the last 10 years, so it is taking some time to get used to it.

  12. So then neweer to you is an auto from the late 1970's or newer :.

     

    Yes, I realized that it isn't so much that it is a newer car, but my unfamiliarity with automatics of any age. I have driven them of course, but emphatically refused to own one until now.

     

    As to the issue of shifting, hunting gears, on hills, If this didn't have the sport shift and such easy access to manual gear selection, I would definitely hate it in the mountains. But as it is, it works very well.

  13. Cool. Yeah, I never use the cruise on passes. The first time it woke me up by jumping two gears before i thought it would shift, right up to 5900 rpm to try to hold speed, I got that.

     

    Much of the time on the gentler stuff, 4 & 5%, just using Sport is plenty, otherwise I drop it into 3 in manual. On Monarch pass I have used 2 on the really steep section at about 50 mph. 3 feels a little luggish. I may try to just hold 3 next time for fuel sake, but I don't think these engines are happy pulling grades below 3000.

     

    They seem to love the 3500 to 4000 range on the steep stuff. I know it uses more gas, but there is more to a happy engine than fuel economy. I just try to make up for it the rest of the time.

×
×
  • Create New...