September 15, 200421 yr Since knowbody here has a membership, I'm going to have get the history through one of these. Which one has a more accurate history report. I'm going to buy (maybe) a 1999 OBW with 67,000 miles on it.
October 8, 200421 yr Since knowbody here has a membership, I'm going to have get the history through one of these. Which one has a more accurate history report. I'm going to buy (maybe) a 1999 OBW with 67,000 miles on it. I have used CarFax several times in the last few years and have been satisfied with their service.
October 8, 200421 yr Since knowbody here has a membership, I'm going to have get the history through one of these. Which one has a more accurate history report. I'm going to buy (maybe) a 1999 OBW with 67,000 miles on it. I have heard good about both.
October 11, 200421 yr Carfax gets my vote. I bought a 30 day unlimited subscription to Carfax late in August. Ran it on a number of cars & always had very current data. When it ran out I discovered that you could only get one 'unlimited' subscription every 6 months. So I picked up a 60 day Autocheck unlimited subscription (for about the same cost). None of the cars I ran had the same level of detail & few contained any data later than 2002. I e-mailed autocheck about it over a week ago & they have yet to respond.
October 11, 200421 yr I've not used autocheck, but I can tell you a little about carfax. Carfax is pretty good for checking the title history / previous owners. However, I ran it on my car once and it showed a transfer of ownership when I moved from one county to another. It's also pretty good with checking the odometer reading. It is not foolproof for accidents, however. I had two vehicles which sustained body damage. Both had sparkling clean carfax records (I did not run autocheck) when both indeed had over $3,000 worth of damage to them. I would advise finding a trustworthy body shop and also a trustworthy mechanic to inspect the vehicle. It may cost you a few bucks for them to preform this service (after all, it does use their time) but I think that would be better than either carfax or autocheck. Good luck.
October 11, 200421 yr It is not foolproof for accidents, however. I had two vehicles which sustained body damage. Both had sparkling clean carfax records (I did not run autocheck) when both indeed had over $3,000 worth of damage to them. Both are only going to pick up total loss accidents. Or major accidents, I think they only show damage 10k and up. Good point on checking it yourself or someone who knows cars. I can easily spot wrecked-then-fixed cars when I go over them for friends and family.
November 10, 200421 yr Carfax is quirky w/ accident reporting. My roomie's '92 bronco showed a minor fender collision in 1993. My dad's '99 Ford P/u was nearly totalled in '00, 9K in damage, requiring a new frame and rear box - not a mention of it on CarFax.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now