Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

lilpusher

Members
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lilpusher

  1. ok seperated those wires as stated and still stuck at crank no start. Any chance I may have cooked the ECM? Oh and a word to the wise :

    this is why you don't by an engine without a full wiring harness to swap over and when the recycler hands you the Ecm with about a foot of wires hanging off it like some crazy rats nest.... tell him where to stick it !!! :mad:

  2. :mad: ok so I 've got a 98 legacy 2.2L going into a 92 loyale. It cranks, the fuel pump primes, won't start, (haven't checked spark yet) here is the thing I'm stuck on there is a wire shown on the front page of the legacy wiring diagram that starts at (ST ig sw) runs to starter interlock, N. Pos. S/W, ecu pins 82 ,75, 17, and 18. then it finally goes through engine wiring harness to an indirect ground (whatever that means.) so I didn't like the idea of having starter circuit voltage going through the computer. I put in a fuse and its constantly blowing during cranking. I wired it into one of the two ignition sw wires that is hot only during cranking (st position) My first thought is why is a starter voltage carying wire running through the computer and straight to ground with no load ( explains blown fuses ). Any ideas I'm completely stumped.

    thanks

  3. yes is is all great info IF the crank and both cams are in time. that's the problem mine slipped out of time and crank sprocket was never marked before belt slipped and was removed.. I am aware this is an interference engine which is why I CAN NOT just start turning the sprockets till they are lined up. That is precisely what happens when a belt brakes going down the road, and how valves get bent. So the question is Knowing that the crank only moved +/- 10deg , and I was only able to mark the original position of the cam sprockets in relation to the belt and not the crank.... Am I looking at pulling heads and putting #1 at TDC then aligning all pulleys before assembly, OR is there another SAFE way. Thanks a fistful. :mad:

  4. got a new engine for my wagon (98 2.2l) the left timing cover was missing, but i turned it over a few times to make sure it was in time. well i thought i'd be slick and just pop off the cam gear and slip the cover behind it. not a good idea. the crank pulley had to come off etc etc. I did mark both cam sprockets but they aren't lined up now. ( the crank sprocket moved slightly when removing the crank pulley.) So is there any way to get it back in time without pulling the heads???!!! :confused:

    thanks.

  5. I made a vise-grip adapter for attatching to a come along yesterday. Great stuff! 2 1/2" 5/16X18 grade 8 bolt. add threads all the way up the shank. weld two chain lings to head of bolt. Probably the most memorable tool I made was a limited access 12mm wrench. Didn't have a vise or a torch to put a curve in it. I did have a seven pound sledge and a curb. All fun and games untill it rocketed across the street and dented the neighbors garage door at 1am! oops.

  6. AWD won't help. You have a higher top end speed due to the RWD, and the AWD launch won't help that much.

     

    How do I know? Well your 2.2l Brat is only .2 seconds slower than my 2.5l AWD Impreza, which runs a 15.1 and thats including almost every bolt on mod (including a lightweight flywheel/sticky clutch)!

     

    I say stick with RWD, get some REAL tires, and run lower tire pressure and you should be fine :headbang:

     

    Enlighten us please. How does adding another drive axle reduce top speed? Top speed is usually determined by Hp, drag, and final drive ratio. Oh and generaly speaking a tire losing traction is not doing much to accelerate a vehicle. Good choice going with all wheel drive. More weight is NEVER the answer for better traction on a drag car.

  7. Ok so i picked out some tires for my ea82 wagon. (general grabber AT2) now what size? I can fit up to 225/75/15 or go down to 205/75/15. :rolleyes:

    Now the larger is 8 pounds heavier 3/4 inch taller and .8 inches wider. So knowing that low low gearing is not going to happen and i'm stuck with 1.59 reduction what would be best for not stalling the old girl in the snow or out in the woods here in washington?

    By the way did stall in the middle of the creek up at fish lake a few weeks ago with 28's and no low range. Help?!

  8. i strongly dissagree! stoichiometry ie. 14 : 1 air fuel ratio is intended to produce BEST EMISSIONS to power ratio. If you follow racing you would notice many people run in the range of 12:1. this results in more power but worse emissions. enough fuel to increase performance but not enough to wash cylinder walls. :burnout:

×
×
  • Create New...