August 22, 200619 yr Author I personally wouldnt ever offroad a forrester. Standard in the us is a auto tranny.. problem #1 problem #2 is the height of them. If I lifted a forrester as high as my GL wagon I'd be lookin at serious rollover issues. Problem #3 Cost.. why pay 10 grand for a car with an auto in it, and then more money to lift it. Not to mention you'd be running a interference engine. When I snap a timing belt, its nice to know I can put one on in 10 minutes and it will run. 2.5L blows a belt, plan on pullin the heads and puttin new valves in. Lol, I agree about your comment on the Auto, I have been flamed for bad talking autos on other forums, but as a personally preference I wouldn't ever buy an auto for myself. Even if it were better offroad like many on AUSubaru claim. Anyway, my verdict is I'd go a old gen for offroad any day of the week. But I think the outbacks are still cool, pitty there Auto standard here and have no low range as far as I know. But I can't afford to bash around in a $15K second hand car...
August 22, 200619 yr come on mate auto's are alright;)just wait till i get this vtd tt auto sorted out in my L and lock up that centre diff:burnout:
August 22, 200619 yr come on mate auto's are alright;)just wait till i get this vtd tt auto sorted out in my L and lock up that centre diff:burnout: Now thats what im talkin about The VTD is pretty awesome for the loose stuff. It just needs a non-open front dif and it would rock. Anyway, autos were never standard on Foresters, its an option. 5mt's are standard. And you can get a 98 forester for ~6k now, possibly less if you find a deal or one with high mileage.
August 23, 200619 yr And you can get a 98 forester for ~6k now, possibly less if you find a deal or one with high mileage. Indeed. But high mileage 2.5s made in 98 are like suicide. They all blew their first head gaskets at 50k miles.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now