Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
|Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created.
We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning
** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it!
Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998!
'99 2.5 issue question
Posted 11 November 2009 - 06:04 PM
So, I am the newest owner of a '99 Outback Limited with a 2.5 and only 63,000 on the clock (verified by the records). I have heard about potential head gasket issues with this particular motor. I assume that this is an issue with a percentage of the produced engines and at some mileage on them.
I'd appreciate some insight into what I've heard bits of and want to know if I made a mistake buying this car. We've owned several Subarus in the past and had little reason not to look at this purchase until I heard about the potential issue with the engines. I cannot afford to replace the engine a short time from now. I bought this because of a bad engine (235,000) in a Jeep I drove until now.
Posted 11 November 2009 - 06:21 PM
i've been driving a 97 outback wagon for over 33k miles, now at 131K, with no problems. i know it could go bad at any time but so far so good.
how much did you pay for your car.?
Edited by johnceggleston, 11 November 2009 - 06:29 PM.
Posted 11 November 2009 - 06:31 PM
Edited by Allpar Mod, 11 November 2009 - 06:35 PM.
Posted 11 November 2009 - 06:44 PM
$4200 off of a friend's lot (he has a garage also and that's how we became friends). The interior is pristine, no rust or significant body/glass damage, and everything works including the heated seats and mirrors.
in my opinion that's a good deal as long as the gaskets are not bad now. if you drive this car 45k miles with out a major incident you will be in good shape. at 105k miles (or 105 months) the timing belts are due. if you have to spend 1500 - 2000$ in a couple of three years it will still be better than buying another used car. hopefully you will go much longer before they ley go.
it doesn't matter when the head gaskets let go, it is a pain and a major expense. but when you have them redone, you will be good for another 100k miles or more.
how many miles do you drive a year.?
Edited by johnceggleston, 11 November 2009 - 06:48 PM.
Posted 11 November 2009 - 06:50 PM
I drive 20,000+ miles/year.
My Outback has no signs of a problem. The temp gauge never moves once it's at operating temperature. I am dealing with a evap code and I'm taking the advice in another thread and Sea Foamed the tankful today. I already replaced the gas cap, no go. It does it at less than a full tank only, strange but probably because the fume level in the tank is higher.
I have to admit that I'm a bit nervous about buying this car now. He gave me a choice of this or another Jeep for the same money. I opted to get back into a Subaru after several years without one. I'm hoping that with 63,000 on it and no problems (I have the maintenance records of the past owner who gave them to my friend), I might be one of the lucky ones. I do a lot of highway driving and the Outback likes to cruise at 80 fairly effortlessly it seems. It also gets about 24 mpg which makes me very happy.
I know what to watch out for with a blown head gasket with the automotive knowledge I already have. I also dealt with a Mazda years ago that blew one, but it came way to close to stranding me. Let's just hope that I have nothing to watch out for at least for a very long time.
Edited by Allpar Mod, 11 November 2009 - 06:52 PM.
Posted 11 November 2009 - 07:06 PM
as i said in the other post, some are just going bad now with 180k miles on them. you will be tired of this car by then, 6 years from now.
Posted 11 November 2009 - 07:34 PM
Posted 11 November 2009 - 08:50 PM
a 99 you may be able to fenangle subaru to work with you with the HG's if it fails. Otherwise just bank the 1500 for HG's as insurance if you are really worried about it.
Why the low mileage?
Posted 11 November 2009 - 09:34 PM
that being said, previous head gasket experience does not prepare you for the Phase I EJ25 head gasket issue. many mechanics and others have been hosed by these. i've been asked by mechanics that know i do subarus to come check them out...half the time i "know" before i even get there what's going on. they can pass all typical head gasket tests - i've even seen them pass the hydrocarbon test.
they overheat, all the way, into the red, you're not going any where once they start having problems. it has nothing to do with coolant level, it can be 100% perfectly full, you're stuck. that's what i dislike most about these Phase I headgaskets. mileage does you no good either, they were failing at 30k years ago when they were much newer.
Posted 12 November 2009 - 06:20 PM
To answer nipper's query about the low mileage, I ran a profile on the car before I agreed to buy it through NADA's version of Carfax. I'm the third owner. First was a lease for one year and the first 20,000 miles were put on it in a relatively short time, then a local couple owned it until now. I do believe they were older, thus the minimal mileage. The numbers all jived so it's for real. The car sat for months before my friend purchased it from them. One passed I believe so the car wasn't needed any longer.
It would be obvious to anyone without automotive knowledge that this car was taken very good care of. It may have been garaged considering the body condition and living in the "rust belt". The paint is quite good with just some clearcoat peel on the hood scoop (weird, nothing on the hood or elsewhere). Just a few parking lot scratches and one ding. The interior looks like new right down to the carpet. Everything works including the heated seats, mirrors, and wipers. That surprised me the most. The Limited interiors are quite nice.
I actually had the choice between this and a '00 Jeep Cherokee for the same money (the car I just parked with 235,000 is a '97 Cherokee which served me very well so it was a difficult choice). I opted for getting back into a Subaru (my last was a '90 Loyale). I just have concerns now with finding out about this head problem that some of the cars had. In fairness, I found out the '00 Jeep 4.0 had valve issues after high mileage so it may be tit for tat with the two vehicles I had a choice of. Though, when I drive it, my concerns get a bit smaller. I do like this car. The better gas mileage that it gets over the Jeeps helps, also.
Posted 13 November 2009 - 01:36 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users