Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, my lurker friend!
![]() |
Welcome to Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an unparalleled Subaru community full of the greatest Subaru gurus and modders on the planet! We offer technical information and discussion about all things Subaru, the best and most popular all wheel drive vehicles ever created. We offer all this information for free to everyone, even lurkers like you! All we ask in return is that you sign up and give back some of what you get out - without our awesome registered users none of this would be possible! Plus, you get way more great stuff as a member! Lurk to lose, participate to WIN*!
* The joy of participation and being generally awesome constitutes winning ** Not an actual guarantee, but seriously, you probably won't regret it! Serving the Subaru Community since May 18th, 1998! |
1999 Legacy Outback
#1
Posted 28 August 2007 - 02:02 PM
How are these engines the car has 160000 miles.
Help.
Mike, KD7GHZ
#2
Posted 28 August 2007 - 02:18 PM
http://www.cars101.c...chive98-99.html
The basic 2.5L (phase I and II) is a good engine. The mid to late 90s has some issues though with the Head Gaskets: http://users.sisna.c...headgasket.html
If you're looking for a 2.2 or 2.5 Turbo, I can tell you I relish my 05 OBW 2.5 Turbo, which now has 42K. Very strong pull when the turbo starts to spool up, and just forces a smile out of me everytime. It **requires** 91 octane, and there is a penalty in gas mileage when a heavy foot is driving. For high mileage and age in terms of performance, reliability and maintenance opinions, those who own them will chime in to tell ya what they think.
#3
Posted 28 August 2007 - 04:31 PM
And any AWD Subaru you want to check for torque bind before buying.
#4
Posted 02 September 2007 - 08:12 AM
Thanks for the replies though.
Mike, KD7GHZ:)
#5
Posted 02 September 2007 - 12:25 PM
Well the 1999 didn't work out. We opted for a 96 Legacy Outback with 108000 miles and a manual 5 speed. The engine runs strong and the manual in my opinion is much better suited for the 2.2 than the auto. It is not the dog that the 95 with the auto was.
Thanks for the replies though.
Mike, KD7GHZ:)
Good to hear you found a car you like, enjoy you new Subie..!
#6
Posted 03 September 2007 - 03:11 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











