Knichol Posted March 28, 2005 Share Posted March 28, 2005 Does anyone know or have a link to what the Hp and Tq ratings are for the EJ22 over the years? I know the EJ22 has stayed pretty much the same but does anyone know what the exact changes are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattocs Posted March 28, 2005 Share Posted March 28, 2005 1990: 130HP / 137 ft-lbs. torque. 1995: 135HP / 140 ft-lbs. torque. 1997: 135HP / 145 ft-lbs. torque. 1999: 142HP / 149 ft-lbs. torque Edmunds.com has the specs for each year listed. Those where the years and the changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knichol Posted March 28, 2005 Author Share Posted March 28, 2005 Hey, thanks for that info! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattocs Posted March 28, 2005 Share Posted March 28, 2005 No problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnuman Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 1990: 130HP / 137 ft-lbs. torque. 1995: 135HP / 140 ft-lbs. torque. 1997: 135HP / 145 ft-lbs. torque. 1999: 142HP / 149 ft-lbs. torque Edmunds.com has the specs for each year listed. Those where the years and the changes. Is there any info on the EPA milage for those engines? I'm wondering if the change in '97 to an interferance engine was worth it, and what could have induced the Subaru engineers to do it. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattocs Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 Is there any info on the EPA milage for those engines? I'm wondering if the change in '97 to an interferance engine was worth it, and what could have induced the Subaru engineers to do it. . . 1996: Manual: 22 mpg / 29 mpg Automatic: 23 mpg / 32 mpg 1999: Manual: 22 mpg / 29 mpg Automatic: : 22 mpg / 29 mpg (1997 wasn't listed on Edmunds.com...so I went with the 1999) Those are for Legacy sedans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrian Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 AFAIK, there have been four different versions of the Legacy: 90-94 95-98 99-04 05-present And each gets worse gas mileage than the one previous. According to the specs on Automotive.com, the EPA highway gas mileage is as follows: 95: 7.6 L/100km 96: 8.1 97: 7.8 (a 4% improvement) 98: 7.8 99: 8.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 1996: Manual: 22 mpg / 29 mpg Automatic: 23 mpg / 32 mpg 1999: Manual: 22 mpg / 29 mpg Automatic: : 22 mpg / 29 mpg This must be mistaken. I highly doubt the auto get better mileage than the manual. AFAIK, there have been four different versions of the Legacy: According to the specs on Automotive.com, the EPA highway gas mileage is as follows: 95: 7.6 L/100km 96: 8.1 97: 7.8 (a 4% improvement) 98: 7.8 99: 8.1 I wish. My 92 legacy gets about 9 L/100 km on the highway at best. And it seems to be in fine running shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattocs Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 The Automatic will shift when you hit a certain RPM range and not let you steadly drive at 4500 RPMS. It makes sence...I dunno. It might be a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 But the people driving those cars to do these tests drive like grandmas on their way to church, so it shouldn't be a problem. Odd though. The Automatic will shift when you hit a certain RPM range and not let you steadly drive at 4500 RPMS. It makes sence...I dunno. It might be a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbslalom Posted March 31, 2005 Share Posted March 31, 2005 The EPA tests in controlled conditions with the A/C off and the ambient air temperature between 68-86 degrees F. plus the car has no weight, and there is no elevation change in the test. If you just happen to encounter any difference in your daily drive your mileage will be diffrent, usually worse. more info here www.fueleconomy.gov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now