
avk
Members-
Posts
945 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by avk
-
The seals stay in the retainers and the bearings come out to the outside. There also are O-rings inder the retainer flanges to seal the bearing bores. When an inner CV (DOJ) boot needed replacement, I also bought an axle seal and an O-ring just in case, but the seal looked good so I left it alone. It looks like a straightforward job as long as you don't change the adjustment, but better to hear from someone who had done it.
-
I guess there shouldn't be much lateral play because the side bearings are pre-loaded, but don't know enough to tell if this is something to worry about. The seals and bearings are held in by the threaded retainers. The preload is controlled by shimming washers and the exact position of the retainer itself. Adjusting may be the trickiest part, the manual describes it.
-
The manual has the procedure for cleaning the IAC valve. In short, it says to disconnect the IAC air hose from the intake duct, keep the engine speed at 2000 rpm and spray the cleaner into the hose. The Subaru manual specifically calls for GM cleaner and gives a part number. Also, a new IAC valve would cost at least $300. Inside it has two solenoids whose duty cycle is controlled by ECU. So this may be a good time to get a $20 manual from techinfo.subaru.com.
-
It might be different with Canadian vehicles, especially if they (or your particular car) were manufactured later in the production run. I know some '95 Imprezas actually corresponded to '96 lineup. At the very least, one can say that among '95 North American 2.2 MT models, there certainly were those w/o OBDII. Also, there were some differences in engine control systems between AT and MT. For example, AT models had EGR system and manifold pressure sensor. And ECU does communicate with TCU. One can imagine that in general, an accurate emission control, which is the purpose of OBDII, is easier to implement with AT and perhaps that's why the system was phased in beginning with those models.
-
The torque applied to the rubber layer is the same as applied to the bolt, that is in the 100 lb*ft range (or say 150 N*m, but sure you are used to ft*lb for a long time now). This is in fact of the same order as the torque in the drive train when accelerating moderately. But I'm ready to accept that the pulley is over-engineered enough for that not to be a problem.
-
That the roll pin should be driven from the chamfered side of the hole is actually mentioned in the service manual. But if it's an old pin being put back in, it may go either way because it's already compressed. With a new one, you'd feel more difference. Anyway, the easier it goes in, the better for the bearings and seals in the differential.