jetpackboy Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 After a year of driving it, I've noticed a marked power decrease with my '09 Outback 2.5 motor vs my old '98 Legacy GT 2.5 motor. Not the same 'oomph'(torque, etc.). Is it just me? Is there some tuning issues that are at play? Both engines are/were Subaru stock w/o any modifications. Just curious. Thanks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idosubaru Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 basically the same engine and power figures. the legacy is a sportier and lighter car than your newer outback so might just be weight and vehicle. the GT's i've had definitely drive very nice, so it's not surprising it would have a better feel. the outbacks sit higher too, so worse handling, better ground clearance, and more wind resistance, roof racks, etc. both were the same type of trans, auto or manual? might have a different feel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetpackboy Posted November 11, 2010 Author Share Posted November 11, 2010 Yeah, both are 5-speed manual. I'm sure your height/weight theory is the culprit! Thanks for the reply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idosubaru Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 a cursory glance shows a possible 400 pound weight difference...but i didn't really study or anything. so - toss a few people in your old GT and see how it does? i love the way the GT's drive, they do have a great feel to them. but i like the ground clearance of the OBW's better. just different. i'm thinking about upgraded sway bars for the OBW, would never cross my mind when driving a GT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralDisorder Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 If you think it's lost power over the year..... has it had a valve adjustment? They are required every 105k miles. If one is missed you can count on a burnt exhaust before you hit the next one. GD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuBrat84 Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 I thought the 97-99 dohc (interference) engines had +10hp vs the "newer" sohc (non-interference) engines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bru73 Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 there is no comprsen hear hear a older gt has a different fule mapping and a lot less bs on it the intake runners of newer cars are more restricive smaller flowing injercters and more restrictive exhaust rember these are tre hugger cars no affence:grin: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairtax4me Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 I thought the 97-99 dohc (interference) engines had +10hp vs the "newer" sohc (non-interference) engines? What non-interference engines? AFAIK all versions of Ej25 are interference design. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuBrat84 Posted November 13, 2010 Share Posted November 13, 2010 I was under the impression that the phase I EJ25 (96-99 or whatever) was interference because it generated the extra 10hp and then they switched to non-interference starting with phase II because of the "broken timing belt kills your engine issue." I'm no expert though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subaru_EJ_engine#EJ25 good write-up about which phases were in which years and what kind of power they are producing. unfortunately it doesn't have information about interference or non-interference. If anyone has a good solid source for that information that would be cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svxpert Posted November 13, 2010 Share Posted November 13, 2010 all subaru 2.5 engines are interference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.