25 year production run on the chevy 305,

3 year run on the chevy 302.

48 year run on the ford 302.

See where my mistake came from? But hey, learn something every day.

25 year production run on the chevy 305,

3 year run on the chevy 302.

48 year run on the ford 302.

See where my mistake came from? But hey, learn something every day.

 

Yup! and knowing is half the battle!

 

Quick fact, did you know that Chrysler had the 350 before GM, 1958... was a B series engine, a full 9 years before the general. (Not a lot of mopar guys know that).

 

Also the displacement for the Chevy 396 was actually a 402 for many years, but the 396 name became so revered after the inital run that they continued to call it a 396

as the title asks "has anyone put a SBC in a subaru XT" , lets give this guy some good infomation , why are we arguing about gas mileage?, I think from other threads he wants to build a awesome offroader that can pull a trailer, ,

 

goodluck longtrack, if it was me it just might be easier to put a subaru body on a chevy 4x4 chassis or even a pre 86 toyota chassis with a chevy engine and trans , you might be better off then trying to deal with weak subaru parts under a big V-8 , keep us all posted

if it was me it just might be easier to put a subaru body on a chevy 4x4 chassis or even a pre 86 toyota chassis with a chevy engine and trans

 

Thats the ticket.

goodluck longtrack, if it was me it just might be easier to put a subaru body on a chevy 4x4 chassis or even a pre 86 toyota chassis with a chevy engine and trans , you might be better off then trying to deal with weak subaru parts under a big V-8 , keep us all posted

 

holy mother, if this thing happens... it will be an absolute BEAST. and GD... I really liked your quote "A smart man learns from his own mistakes. A wise man learns from others mistakes. A stupid man never learns at all." just thought it was worth posting twice.