October 2, 200718 yr another good reason to drive a subaru! the article is from a canadian newspaper. for those of you that don't know the reference to david suzuki .... think al gore! cut and paste the link into your url bar. http://www.infomedia.gc.ca/AllContent/articles/unrestricted/2007/09/all20079630211532_16.htm regards, mark
October 2, 200718 yr Author another good reason to drive a subaru! the article is from a canadian newspaper. for those of you that don't know the reference to david suzuki .... think al gore! cut and paste the link into your url bar. http://www.infomedia.gc.ca/AllContent/articles/unrestricted/2007/09/all20079630211532_16.htm regards, mark sorry... may be a bad link. try this one.... http://www.infomedia.gc.ca/AllContent/articles/unrestricted/2007/09/all20079630211532_16.htm
October 2, 200718 yr for those of you that don't know the reference to david suzuki .... think al gore! How about "what kind of an environmentalist are you?" David Suzuki should be WAY better known than Al Gore by this point. I mean, sure Al invented the internet (*snicker*), but David Suzuki has been an Environmental Activist since the '70's.
October 2, 200718 yr sorry... may be a bad link.try this one.... http://www.infomedia.gc.ca/AllContent/articles/unrestricted/2007/09/all20079630211532_16.htm I still can't get the link to work.
October 3, 200718 yr for those of you that don't know the reference to david suzuki .... think al gore! The difference is Gore doesn't pretend to a scientist the way Suzuki does.
October 3, 200718 yr The difference is Gore doesn't pretend to a scientist the way Suzuki does. Not to keep this heading off-topic, but David is a scientist.
October 3, 200718 yr Not to keep this heading off-topic, but David is a scientist. Actually he was a scientist. To be a scientist you have to objective and David has long since ceased to be objective. Like most enviromentists, he starts with a conclusion and looks for facts to support it. He only uses science to support his cause. Shame really, he used to be a respected figure.
October 3, 200718 yr Actually he was a scientist. To be a scientist you have to objective and David has long since ceased to be objective. Like most enviromentists, he starts with a conclusion and looks for facts to support it.[...]I see...Could you please provide a couple of specific examples where David Suzuki used invalid data in the transition from hypothesis to conclusion?
October 3, 200718 yr Gore has been concerned with the environment since the early '80's, maybe even late '70's. Not trying to defend one side or another, in fact I am not defending Gore. Just simply stating that he has been concerned longer than most think.
October 4, 200718 yr The thing is that his "concern" is tied directly to the quantity of money, power, influence, and/or votes for him involved. EDIT: That may be slightly unfair. He may have actually had some concern of his own at least at one point. Trouble is that he's been overcome by the ludicrous short-sightedness and non-thinking that plagues so many of the granolas.
October 4, 200718 yr Yeah, uh, science fiction movie endorsing robots and guys I've never heard of aside, what was the article about? Neither link worked for me.
October 7, 200718 yr The difference is Gore doesn't pretend to a scientist the way Suzuki does. Seriously? You just suggested that Gore actually uses sound scientific data when drawing conclusions? He is one of the biggest hypocritical “I’m in it for fame because no cares about me otherwise” morons there has even been.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now