Subarutex Posted August 21, 2007 Author Share Posted August 21, 2007 Sorry it took so long... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffast Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 and by 30 hp suberdave wins!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subarutex Posted August 21, 2007 Author Share Posted August 21, 2007 True, but we are within 10 ft.lbs of torque of eachother. You'll see on Dave's graph how his torque/HP happen late in the RPM's. Thats the stock JDM V-Limited WRX computer. Now look at mine. Torque upfront where its funnest. I need to work on switching out my turbo for something different. Mine really doesn't have a topend. My car is running a Haltech E6K and has been professionally tuned by http://www.getadomtune.com Dave - Check out getting a Hydra from Dom. I think it would be a much better fit to your plans than a powerFC. Regardless of which you go with, talk to Dom about tuning it. He is a goldmine of information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezapar Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 Tex was in some pretty sweet company. Before him was a baddass XR4Ti turbo. Beautiful noise out of the back. Couple of friggin' volvos too. I didn't stick around to ask. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezapar Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 Tex, pm me your email addy, I'll send the 5 or 6 pics you took. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86BRATMAN Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 Nice numbers guys. I notice it was on a Mustang dyno, my experiance has shown about 10-15% lower numbers from Mustang as opposed to a Dynajet or Dynapac style dyno. For compataive purposes, a friend of mine had his 100% srock 05 WRX dynoed on a Dynajet about a year and ahalf ago, the figures were 191HP, and 196ft/lbs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subarutex Posted August 21, 2007 Author Share Posted August 21, 2007 On the KAS Mustang dyno a stock 2.0L WRX puts down 155-160hp at the wheels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis ex24 Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 who owns that ultimate rx now? also...those are some stellar numbers, this was a swap i take it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subarutex Posted August 22, 2007 Author Share Posted August 22, 2007 who owns that ultimate rx now? also...those are some stellar numbers, this was a swap i take it? I do. Both cars are EJ20G swapped with 4:11 running gear... thats about where the similarities end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daeron Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 Volvos arent awful.. They call em "bricks" heh... I had a buddy who owned both a turbo 240, and a turbo 780 intercooled. nice enough cars, but very rare to find em in a fivespeed.. thats my biggest beef with em. Actually, right now there are two attractive lady friends of mine who count on me to care for their Volvos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suberdave Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 I dont know. i had a 2000 Volvo V70R. and i would take my Subaru over that thing any day of the week... http://www.suberdave.com/volvo/volvo.htm it was more comfortable, but was an auto, and a big brick to drive... Subaru Wagon FTW!!! -=Suberdave=- http://www.suberdave.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daeron Posted August 23, 2007 Share Posted August 23, 2007 I dont know. i had a 2000 Volvo V70R. and i would take my Subaru over that thing any day of the week... Fixed your post, it now points out your problem :-p Seriously, I wouldn't touch a car this side of say, 1996, with a ten foot pole. ANY of them are too bloody big for my tastes, except for the sardine can miatas. ohhh, how glad I am for the miata; I still wouldn't buy a newer one though. Anyhow, my friends turbo bricks were both 80's cars, one an 83 and one an 89; the 83 weighed about 2900 pounds, (IIRC) and was a four door sedan MUCH more spacious than my GL-10. Very nice interior, too. I have always felt that vintage volvos were rather maligned vehicles... Like anything else, you have to be ready to work on it, but if you are it isnt SO bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis ex24 Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 I do. Both cars are EJ20G swapped with 4:11 running gear... thats about where the similarities end. ok im way late with this then. i was MIA for a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.