WJM

it does not. Slightly different.

I have noticed no loss in top end. Goes to 6500 with no issues. The reason to decrese the dia of the exhaust was to equip the car with a quiet and streetable exhaust that doesnt drag the ground. Since its got edecent sound, it relatively quiet...and seeming doesnt reduce power that I can tell.

Yes, the rear is the same.

I am waiting on prices...he carrys the stuff, but not the Leone stuff reguarly.

yeah...well...oh well.

30% loss ofr WRX and odl skool 5 spds 4wds.

Dale at boxer4racing.com.

I have only used 4WD chassis dynos. There was no slippage. The rollers are deisgned to not loose traction (aka they have stickey surfaces) The Dyno Jet that I went to at first was brand new and freshly calibrated...it was 100% accurate on the numbers that other cars pulled in stock form. This mustang experiment is to see just 'far off' the mustang is as compared to the dyno jet. My intake remins almost the same...but I went from a mushroom-foam type filter to a regular cone-K&N style filter. ANd I cant put the bigger glass pack exhaust back on....i hacked it into peices to make the current one.

its the "strut bar to chassis mount" that looks like it sohudl be the leading rod....but is it or is it not???

i was talkinga bout sway bar stuff mostly.

Timing is SO critical. big ping will destroy pistons. Little ping will fatige rods. We've had several cars thrwo rods due to other shiops turning DOWN knock sensitivity so it posts good numbers....but 5k miles later...POP...new engine.

Careful!!!!

What HE said. Looks like I might get the RX on a mustang dyno this comming weekend. Not sure yet tho.

thats what it is. I just couldnt remmeber the name. I sold some to JWX a while back.

I can only get you whats listed there. :-p I am waiting on JWX to measure some control arms to see if that 24MM control arm bushing would work. I know the 28 is too big as is the EA82 stuff....but i want to be 100% on this. The rest is up to you guys to figure out as the sway bar stuff is pretty self explanitory....its the rod that goes back to the body from the control arm that I've not figured out.

Just what we ALL need.

We are about (we as in Pleaides and I it looks like) to take the RX over to a Mustang AWD dyno and calibrate it to Dynojet numbers....the only problem is that I am not supposed to have any changes to the car since the dynojet runs..... I do have a change. The exhaust. Its still got the TWE header/DP and stock turbo....BUT...instead of having a 2.5" back with a glass pack, its now got a 2.5 inch 3 way cat, that after it reduces down to 2.25 and then down to 2.0 inches thru a 2.0 inch glass pack at the end. And im using a different air filter. Are these two changes going to seriously change the actual HP output? I didnt feel anytohng on the 'butt dyno' Seriously...what does USMB think?

Stock rubber is bad, mmmmkay.

ROFL!!!!

The internet is not always 100% correct. HOWEVER...when you get ppl that know what they are doing and ahve others that know as well...and they back each other up with results and numbers that are real....then you know its true.

Yes, Polyurethane. See this site: http://www.boxer4racing.com under WRX/STi and suspension and bushings.

YAY! Dale at boxer4 told me they listed a bunch of suff for them....and 6 months later I finally get around to looking. I'll post up some prices tomorrow after I get off the phone with him.

IHI RHB5 VF7 for the EA82T from 1985 to 1991.

The STi one is quite larger than the WRX unit. Go with a WRX unit unless you have a rather large turbo (Larger than 13G/VF34 or larger) and serious engine management.

Ditto.