January 3, 200521 yr what would be the maximum compression that an ea81 is able to run,detonation problems aside (propane/lpg runs quiet happy @ 16:1) i have to rebuild my motor so turbo pistons are on my 'to do' list what i likely to be my weak link ie bottom end,head gasket........? cheers for any help
January 3, 200521 yr spfi pistons bolt in and make an ea81's ratio 9.5:1, do you have any photo's of your engine bay? And i thought for forced induction a lower ratio is better?
January 3, 200521 yr i have to rebuild my motor so turbo pistons are on my 'to do' listwhat i likely to be my weak link ie bottom end,head gasket........? cheers for any help Why would you use turbo pistons? they are the lowest compression of all the pistons available
January 3, 200521 yr Author i want to know the max comp the motor can stand so i know how much boost i can stuff in BTW what compression do the aeroengine 81s run? i ate a piston last time, hence the turbo slugs i'll post pic if i can get my camera to talk to my computer...dumba*s technolgy Why would you use turbo pistons? they are the lowest compression of all the pistons available
January 5, 200521 yr LPG dude, so would I! Excellent work, thanks for the lowdown. I have PM'd my email to you, Cheers Matt
May 1, 200817 yr First, yes I know this thread is three years old! (But I searched, like we always like people to do) Having scoured through all of the old posts, I have never seen a good answer for this. What is the max compression one could expect to get on an ea81 that would be reliable, without having to go to custom pistons? I am wondering if 10:5-11:5 is possible/advisable. And if so, what would be the most cost effective way to get there.
May 2, 200817 yr I am wondering if 10:5-11:5 is possible/advisable. And if so, what would be the most cost effective way to get there. No. In short the quench design of the heads could not withstand it. Detonation city. 9.0:1 would be alright - 9.5:1.... maybe 10:1 using the EA82 SPFI would likely be alright as the fuel injection can handle the ignition timeing better to allow it. Anything over about 9 would require computer fuel injection to control the ignition timing or you would have to retard it so far it would be worthless to bother. Massive compression without the ability to advance the timing is worse than lower compression. GD
May 2, 200817 yr ...Detonation city.... what about water injection? You're going to boost an engine, might as well toy with it.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now