Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Ultimate Subaru Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Strut BOTTOM lift? (as opposed to strut TOP lift)

Featured Replies

Hey folks,

 

I know the preferred method for lifting a subaru is a subframe lift along with strut-top spacers.

 

This worked really nice for the EA cars, but Im toying with the idea of a lift for a 98 Forester.

 

I know there are lift kits available, and they incorporate the strut top spacers. While this does lift the vehicle very well, it still leaves the lower spring perches of the struts an inch or less from the tops of your tires. :-\ This would of course effectively kill the mounting of significantly larger tires.

 

There was talk a while ago about someone who re-welded the spring seats further up on the struts, but in so doing... you lose suspension travel.

 

MY QUESTION :

 

Is it a do-able thing to re-work the BOTTOM of the strut where it bolts to the knuckle? I know you'd still have to drop the subframe with spacers.... but it seems lifting from the strut bottom would give you the height you want.... it would get the lower spring seats away from the tops of the tires, and you'd keep all your strut travel!

 

Ideas? Discussion?

I'm not familiar with how many mounting points the new gens have on the bottom of the strut. If it is more than one, I think it could be done quite well.

 

If it is similar to the older cars, like gen 2s, then I think you would have a problem keeping the whole deal from spinning. That's really the only reason I haven't done something like that for my gen 2.

 

Just keep in mind how much stress is put on the strut, and how many adjustments it is critical for. The camber alone is a huge issue.

 

If you have any pictures of the setup, it may be good to post some here too! I'd love to see something like this done.

Someone with a lot of knowledge on this is Bratsrus1, jerry did this on his hatchbrat and it works very well. If I recall he machined the spacers out of solid stock.

  • Author

If I end up going this route, I will ASSUREDLY post pics. :grin:

 

The Forester has a 2-bolt setup. (one being an adjustable camber bolt)

 

I know it would take some precision measuring and fabbing, but so does a strut top spacer.

 

Im just kindof fishing for anybody that has ever done (or almost done) this before... :confused:

  • Author
If I recall he machined the spacers out of solid stock.

 

Thanks!

the problem is, the bracket on the strut that attaches to the knuckle actually extends inside the rim, so if you make an extension that attaches the lower hole on the strut to the upper hole on the knuckle, the upper part of the bracket will hit the rim.

 

 

IIRC, SJR tried it.

It sounds possible similar to what I did when lifting my brat

 

090gi0.th.jpg

 

076em1.th.jpg

 

With the adjustable camber you may need to design a system that lets you adjust it more as the longer strut will cause a positive camber \--/.

the problem is, the bracket on the strut that attaches to the knuckle actually extends inside the rim, so if you make an extension that attaches the lower hole on the strut to the upper hole on the knuckle, the upper part of the bracket will hit the rim.

 

 

IIRC, SJR tried it.

 

can you turn the strut 180 degrees so the camber adjusters are inboard on the strut and make the bracket so the top mounts are on the inside and the bottoms are on the outside like they should be. ?

With the adjustable camber you may need to design a system that lets you adjust it more as the longer strut will cause a positive camber \--/.

 

The rear camber isnt adjustable on the newer cars. You could use "crash bolts" in the place of the factory bolts, but they suck and will slip, I tried them and hated them. On my Impreza I ended up using Whiteline turnbuckle rear lateral links to adjust camber, This would work perfectly. You could also use a camber plate. The camber plates that come with most coilovers for the front struts will fit on the rear strut mount also.

 

So I bet he could use extensions, kinda like you made. Numbchux made a good point though, the two mounting bolts are "inside" the wheel. You would have to make a extension to the bottom of the strut and then make a mounting plate bracket that goes inside the wheel to the two mounting holes.

Oh and nice job on the strut extensions. Looks good.

Because the Foresters use the top and bottom bolt design which has a bracket rapping around the knuckle I'd say you could weld a some steel bar to those brackets to drop the knuckle away from the strut. I'd want to get some sort of camber adjuster at the same time as this would easily screw up camber if drilled slightly wrong.

Just food for thought. I'm a grind/weld happy lunatic.

  • Author

Well, I put 'er up on the lift last night at the garage, and the situation seemed to call for one of two things.

 

A) Something like this (look ma! No fat spring perches!) in combination with a strut TOP lift: (although it seems a crime to cover up adjustable shocks with a strut top lift block)

b747_1.JPG

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MEGAN-RACING-FLEX-COILOVER-DAMPER-98-01-SUBARU-IMPREZA_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33631QQihZ012QQitemZ220212520236QQrdZ1QQsspagenameZWDVW#ebayphotohosting

 

OR

 

B) Run some wheels with significantly less negative offset (which will only lead to other troubles, I know)

 

Looks like this isnt going to be for those who are "faint of cash"

:-\

I believe what the guy in coneticut with the legacy jacked wayyy up did was a strut bottom lift. I think they cut the the bracket off of the bottom of the strut that bolts to the knuckle, then took another set of struts, sawed them in half, so that they were empty tubes with the bracket at the bottom, and welded them onto the bottom of the working strut. This extended the strut, but didn't give the clearance/offset issues that would happen if you built an extension off of the working struts bracket.

 

THIS WAGON:http://www.ultimatesubaru.org/forum/showthread.php?t=81629

 

You pretty much sleeve the bottom of the working strut with the gutted strut as an extension, then weld.

When I lengthened the front struts on my EA82, I found some hydraulic tubing, the ID the same as the OD of the struts. After cleaning off the brackets on a new strut, and cutting the bottom off of an old strut, I sleeved the thing from the spring perch to the bracket on the bottom, the empty bottom is "weldable", and the spring perch is "weldable".

yes, it's been done on an EA car. seriously......it's a different animal on the EJs.

 

 

 

I wouldn't run full coilovers, especially not low quality ones. if you're lifting something, I'm assuming you're going to be using the suspension travel you have, if you go coilover, you'll probably limit that, a lot.

 

 

IMHO, the best setup would be strut top blocks, stock struts, and Ground Control coilover sleeves. available in any spring rate, so you can order some that are the same as stock.

 

here's a pic of a ground control sleeve on a stock subaru strut:

7513_fs.jpg

 

look at all that unused spring perch you could hack off.

  • Author

7513_fs.jpg

 

look at all that unused spring perch you could hack off.

 

Now THATS what Im talking about!

:headbang:

 

Thanks... something like that would be perfect.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Now THATS what Im talking about!

:headbang:

 

Thanks... something like that would be perfect.

 

guy on RS25 posted pics of Ground control install where they removed the stock lower perch on their AGXs:

2411767725_fa32146b46_o.jpg

 

2411766197_0a62760130_o.jpg

 

 

more here (pretty humorous pics too!)

http://www.rs25.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78808

 

 

yes, it's an $800 suspension system, and I'm not sure if KYB makes the AGXs for an outback.....BUT, the adjustables would be pretty sweet. the AGXs on the softest setting are about the same as stock. and you could stiffen them up and rally it a bit :clap:

Next week I get a new car its a 92 Legacy Sedan 4 dr with 5 speed , its going to be lifted 4" with the lift at the bottom of the stock strut , now I have a few ?? length wise whats all the strut options for the EJ , say stock legacy , outback and others, ?

stock legacy , outback and others, ?

 

that's about it. outback and forester are taller, other than that, height-wise, they're all pretty much the same. there are a couple different lower spring diameters, so the lower perch differs....but height-wise, pretty much the same.

I've got an '02 WRX. I have looked into lifting it a little and found that the forester stock struts are between 1.5-2" taller than stock wrx struts. I don't know compared to a legacy though.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.