-
Posts
1333 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by rweddy
-
Loyale manual tranny VS. automatic
rweddy replied to nozoxon's topic in Old Gen.: 80's GL/DL/XT/Loyales...
I agree totally! I have only owned 2 auto one a GL the other a GL-10. The GL-10 you could live with, but the other was unbearable. Terrible on gas, slow, shifted slowly, etc. Especially since you have a stick to compare it to like I did. Stay with the stick. -
Just got back from driving it. Engine felt strong, but smoke from passenger side of engine. Is there a seal to the turbo there? Also cv noise on that side, so it could be just grease but when parked it left a dime to quarter sized leak on that size. Body pretty bad, had been hit in the middle and someone pulled the hood back out and used sheet metal screws to hold the front end together. Needs new brake pads, pwr mirrors do not work, windshield made wind noise at speed. Ect. He is asking 1500 and I offered him 500, he walked away. I am thinking on making him sit on it for a few days and then going back with 750??
-
I would agree with Setright on running synthetic in your vehicle. I have run it all my for years, my 91 wagon with synthetic got 2mpg better and much better cold start ups. But I disagree about Redline, They have great oil and great axle, tranny gear oils. I know Setright swears by Castrol manual tranny fluid, but here in the US it cost nearly $30 per quart and Redline is $7. Most of the racers I know run redline everything and it works great.
-
That is correct No subarus are very easy to work on, and local shops will give you better service than dealerships. Of the above if you are want reliablity stay away from Chrysler, Ford, & GM. And the big 3 have poorly desinged AWD systems. I would say look at toyota, I do not know much about Nissan, I have owned 3 pathfinders over the years, great trucks, somewhat hard to work on. I am not sure how good bad thier AWD system is. Subaru and Audi/VW has the best AWD systems on the market. IMO
-
Set the brake There are several reasons not to run your tank below 1/4.1st The fuel pump has to work harder the lower the fuel volume in the tank. So the more you keep the tank full, the longer the fuel pump will last. 2nd Sediment at the bottom of the tank can get pulled into the screen that sits before the fuel pump in the tank, causing the pump to work harder, ie not last as long. 3rd Yes you have a fuel filter/s but then you need to change them frequently, plus if they get clogged it can leave you stranded or worse allow contaminates into the fuel system that could damage injectors, fuel rails, etc. 4th Condensation, the lower the tank the more water that can accumulate in the tank, which can cause rust and fuel line issues.
-
That is great!! I am not siding with the dealership at all. I am just stating legal precedence on this. If you went to court and tried to get them to pay for this it would go like this. Subaru would say that this vehicle slipped through the new car prep, they forgot to cut off the Tie down points. They would state these are not for towing but for use by Subaru in shipping of vehicle from factory to dealerships. They would explain how this is a safety issue and they took them off to protect the consumer. blabla bla And Subaru would win.
-
Unfortunately they do. If this is a safety issue then they not only have the right, but they are required to do so legally. What if they did not cut them off and the airbags went off? Then they would be liable for a lawsuit because they did not cut them off when they had the vehicle in for service. I do not think there is anything that can be done about it.