-
Posts
18629 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
25
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by nipper
-
You mean water injection?
-
PS. You can also add in open deck vs closed deck design (and even hybrid deck....confused yet ?). To me i know how it fails in subarus, i just dont know what kicks off the entire process. Since it is an open deck, the HG is not fully supported. Imagine trying to pry against a hollow core door vs a solid door. the solid door wont give, or will take a very long time and alot of work. The hollow door will yield fairly quickly. Since they were commited to hollow core doors, they went with a 3 peice door (HG) where the outer skins were steel. Now it is as strong as the solid core door (still with me?). Now since there is not a 100% failure rate (i'm looking at you Dodge Neon) the question is what sets off the failure. That I dont know, and i dont know if anyone will ever truly have an answer, but you can design around all the known causes and beef them up, and erradicate the unknown cause. Maybe it is just one bad tank of gas that causes ping, maybe its a bad batch of HG's, maybe it was just the monday crew in japan hungover. nipper
-
Nope. HG's are extreemly complicated parts and no one issue kills a sooby HG. u look at the history of the automotive industry during this time, emissions went from OBDI to OBDII with tighter specs. There was a very short time to adapt and desighn to the new standard. Everyone had head gasket issues during this time. The materials at the time were at the edge of what they can do (which is why the failure rate industry wide was from 100% to 15% and everything inbetween depending upon how cheap the HG's were made to begin with). Also some things need real world testing. Even lab testing takes time for analysis and to come up with a correction for the failure. When a critical part fails a test, the test starts over. Sometimes the tests themselves, while consistant, do not reflect real world conditions, and sometimes they just can't (like reproducing 150,000 miles of city driving). Failure starts in the combustion chamber, where spot temps are a few 1000 degres and combustion pressures can be in the 15,000-18,000 psi or more range. This is all precisly controlled by the computer, except when you get knock. Knock is one of the biggets detriments to HG (assuming the engine doesnt already have a design weakness) Subarus tend to run fairly consistantly at 175- 205 depending upon the outside air temp and load. ine to market (computers We expect alot of our cars, and sometimes, we just have to be living labratories. It can take up to 10 years to bring a new engine to market, though computers (for development) have gotten faster and have reduced that number to 6, unless something in the market changes, then it is back to square 1 again. nipper
-
People people people, when you skimp on the timing belt parts they will come back to haunt you. This is like the 5th post on three different boards I have had to answer, all about the same mileage where people did not replace the idler or tensioner (which subaru highly recomends gets replaced with the TB. Before we start throwing money at sensors we need to read the engine codes. Feel free to throw all your money you want at it, but thats is not my way of doing things. 1st we need codes. 2nd we need to insepct the idler and tendioner and engine timing to make sure it is all good. Rough running and then no running is not a good thing. Sensor possabilities - Engine temp (but car would run when it was warm outside with no isseus) or smoke at start up. Crank sensor, no start at all OR a fire then a stall, then a few no starts, then be fine.
-
My outlook on OE parts. If the original part lasted 106,000 or more miles, I would go with OE again. Thats just me. Also look at the on line suppliers to see if the costs are competative to aftermarket. I will say I have yet to hear of an aftermarket WP going bad prematurely, in any make or model car. Seals (if you are smart) should be OE. T-stat (what the heck your there) should be OE. DO the PCV valve just because. nipper
-
That first shop is a moron, and the second one a rip off. www.endwrench.com in the archives under engine in the timing belt article specifically recomneds replacing bothe parts and even states they arent designed to last past 106,000 miles. Bring the car home and do it yourself. The most I ever paid for a TB change (including seals and water pump) was 650.00. nipper
-
What the heck is this thing?
nipper replied to bratgrl's topic in Historic Subaru Forum: 50's thru 70's
I am going with a circuit breaker. nipper -
Better question, how long do you want the car to last and how much money do you want to piss away? You can not reuse head gaskets, as they are a compression gasket. They are designed to be deformed when the bolts are torqued. What are you calling low comprsssion? I would do an engine swap, as doing a low budget rebuild will most likley come back to bite you in the wallet relativly quickly. nipper
-
Gary with his attitude, i would just let hime spend the 850.00 ffor that cats and find out that wont fix his problem. i also wouldnt tell him to use a search to find the 100's of discussions on cats and O2 sensors. I also wouldnt tell him that the 420 code 99% of the time refers to a tired Front O2 sensor which needs to be OE. I also wouldnt tell him that there is a second O2 sensor behind the cat that can be replaced with a generic aftermarket sensor. Nosirreebob i wouldnt tell him a blasted thing. nipper
-
I would test it at the battery, but your way isnt horrible, your voltage regulator is out of wack. Them not having a mechanic nor having the tester (which is a basic tool for an alt shop as it only takes 1 minute to run a test) is inexcusable. At that high a voltage you are damaging the battery. I dont like this shop. nipper