March 6, 200719 yr What is that dissy off of? Looks like you've got it mounted to where the oil feed on the ej22t heads would plumb in.
March 6, 200719 yr Author What is that dissy off of? Looks like you've got it mounted to where the oil feed on the ej22t heads would plumb in. yep, sure is in that spot.take it off and look at it. i will tell when people learn how to search:grin: it is readily available info, that is how i found it
March 6, 200719 yr yep, sure is in that spot.take it off and look at it. i will tell when people learn how to search:grin: it is readily available info, that is how i found it Hey, I'm lazy...
March 6, 200719 yr Author and , by the way, i searched for months to get where i am with this project.so, is it really fair for anyone to "peek " at my paper whilst i sit in the desk next to them? just kidding.but you can still search:grin: Hey, I'm lazy...
March 6, 200719 yr Author sweet, i was pretty sure that you would come up with something.goodthing i didn't spend 30 bucks on the harness for it.unless you want me to.as long as the uhaul place has a tow dolly we are ion business.cheers, brian Hey Brian This is Jerry, when you come over to my house i have the wiring for that dissy it's a simple hook up. Thanks Jerry
March 6, 200719 yr Author imagine that So I see you were more forthcoming with your information 9 months ago. LOL
March 6, 200719 yr oh my christ! Carbed ej22 transfer case D44 or toyota 8" 44" tires ea81 wagon WOW words can not describe.Although to fit 44's you would need like 20" of lift
March 6, 200719 yr Author go back and reread.then post. i never said anything about 44's...at least not in that way. oh my christ!Carbed ej22 transfer case D44 or toyota 8" 44" tires ea81 wagon WOW words can not describe.Although to fit 44's you would need like 20" of lift
March 6, 200719 yr lol!! they thought 44" tires!... if i could only access the smilies panel at work! dana 44's, common half ton axles. but if your going toyota. in my opinion, build the yota axles. with 30 spline longfields in the front and chromo rears you can get about the same strength as a dana 60. minus the smaller pinion and ring gear. and truss the hell out of them. that's what i'm doing to mine, but i'll be running 39.5" iroks! can't wait to see this build.
March 6, 200719 yr Author right on, that is all i was worried about really,the r&p.but i guess i should just shut up and build what i will have .it is still burlier than most. at least around here.n.w.w is another story.cheers, brian
March 6, 200719 yr Hmm...that car is light. I've got an AMC 20/Dana 30 combo that would be perfect for it. I'll even be so kind as to trade you straight across for those Yota axles!
March 6, 200719 yr right on, that is all i was worried about really,the r&p.but i guess i should just shut up and build what i will have .it is still burlier than most. at least around here.n.w.w is another story.cheers, brian Yeah, some there think our mods are booty fabbed:rolleyes:
March 6, 200719 yr monstaru what are you doing for suspension? and are you building a frame? steering? I agree with rooinater stick to the toyota axles to take advantage of how light this thing could end up being, d44's would add a couple hundred pounds over toys even albeit at the lowest point of the rig, but still. how much you think it will weigh, 2700 or so?
March 6, 200719 yr Author Hmm...that car is light. I've got an AMC 20/Dana 30 combo that would be perfect for it. I'll even be so kind as to trade you straight across for those Yota axles! not a chance junior.......i have started looking into beefing the yota axles like jared suggested and think it would be the better option and less headache.cheers, brian
March 7, 200719 yr One question.................Why take a perfectly good fuel injected/DIS, engine and go backwards by converting to carburation and distributer? Makes no sence to me. I know the aircraft guys did the carburation thing before they figured out how to make the injection work at altitude, but I take it this build is not getting wings. And the distributer?
March 7, 200719 yr One question.................Why take a perfectly good fuel injected/DIS, engine and go backwards by converting to carburation and distributer? Makes no sence to me.I know the aircraft guys did the carburation thing before they figured out how to make the injection work at altitude, but I take it this build is not getting wings. And the distributer? What if it is...? You never know. I believe the goal is to get monstrous amounts of power out of it via carburetion. Am I right, monstaru/brian?
March 7, 200719 yr Carbs are simpler (and so is skipping the EJ22 wiring harness) and Brian prefers troubleshooting carbs to EFI. Plus this is sorta-new territory and that in itself is fun.
March 7, 200719 yr One question.................Why take a perfectly good fuel injected/DIS, engine and go backwards by converting to carburation and distributer? Makes no sence to me.I know the aircraft guys did the carburation thing before they figured out how to make the injection work at altitude, but I take it this build is not getting wings. And the distributer? Because it will be more reliable on the trail. Its like a big EA82 without the HG problems.
March 7, 200719 yr Because it will be more reliable on the trail. Its like a big EA82 without the HG problems. That basically describes the best engine anyone could ever make.
March 7, 200719 yr Because it will be more reliable on the trail. Have you had experiance with carb vs injection for off roading? Or distributors in wet off road conditions. Or just the reliability of the EJ engine managment system in general?
March 8, 200719 yr Because it will be more reliable on the trail. Its like a big EA82 without the HG problems. Maybe if you got on the trail more often you would know the difference:rolleyes: If I had my preferences, I would choose the FI and DIS. But right now I'm stuck with a EA81 with a weber carb. The key word here tho is "personal preference".
March 8, 200719 yr Author i'll take over from here boys.thnaks though;) so, you, much like half of the population thinks that efi is a better setup.i,like a majority of the "old school" generation prefer carbs. why , you ask?.because being able to fix something with duct tape and bailing wire appeals to me in a high mountain sitiation(yes i said sitiation) a tad bit of porting and polishing is necessary to get the same output hp wise as an efi.but,with less "electronical"(yes i did say "electronical")nonsense under there,i am able to troubleshoot on a dime,being chased by "the man",and under extreme stress. now, if you wish to argue about which is"better".go start your own thread.this is a build thread.and i am posting what i am building.if you don't like it.don't read it.cheers, hope you enjoy my unconventional,gonna whoop your efi rump roast in the mud when you lose your battery....thread. brian:grin: oh and to just answer your question.because some people like carbs.and not everyone is trying to go" bigger and better." some people are simple ,like me. oh ,and rob.************ fuel injection,unless it is propane. One question.................Why take a perfectly good fuel injected/DIS, engine and go backwards by converting to carburation and distributer? Makes no sence to me.I know the aircraft guys did the carburation thing before they figured out how to make the injection work at altitude, but I take it this build is not getting wings. And the distributer?
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now