-
Posts
1877 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by wtdash
-
So only up to 98' Legacy and 99' Outback is basically drop-in? YES 99' Outback has the updated rear crossmember? Not sure What you're referring to here? All '99 models have the newer style bellhousing w/the 8 bolts. But the earlier 4 -bolt engines still attach....just use the matching trans-side mounts.
-
Also, all the DOHC EJ engines - NON-AVCS* - should be the same. So, the turbo engines (EJ205, EJ20G) DIY on NASIOC, etc. for the WRX will also be a good reference. AS NOTED, the cams must be rotated a speciific direction as this is a fully interference engine. The LH (USA driver's) side are the finicky ones, IIRC. They llike to turn w/out much provocation while setting the T-belt. Remember to 'count your teeth'...2x+ to ensure you're 'belted in'. GL, TD *I've never attempted an AVCS/adjustable vavle Tbelt job so can't comment.
-
VIN
wtdash replied to djmark7's topic in 1990 to Present Legacy, Impreza, Outback, Forester, Baja, WRX&WrxSTI, SVX
Still not clear...are you looking for a 'free' VIN check - aka Autocheck or Carfax? Check you PM for more info. -
2.5 swap
wtdash replied to djmark7's topic in 1990 to Present Legacy, Impreza, Outback, Forester, Baja, WRX&WrxSTI, SVX
HI, Please remember to Search, as this is one of the most covered swaps for Subarus - right after the 2.5 to 2.2 swap. :-) yes, this will work. You may have some small differences w/the vacuum lines - the '98 had the Charcoal canister back by the rear of the wagon - the '96 is pass. front under the hood. Also, there may be a wire to the P/S pump sensor on the '98 that won't be there on the '96. Good news is that the '98 has more HP/Torque than the '96 AND it can run on Regular. Remember! Do the Head Gasket/ HG BEFORE you install any EJ25/2.5 engine (2.2 is recommended, too,). Unless you have documented proof they've been done. -
No offese to GD, but did some # crunching on one of the 'Auto Sales Data' sites and the mid-size trucks are doing OK. See attached. You can't (fairly) compare to the full-size Ford/Chevy/Dodge as they're in a league of their own. Even the 3rd place Dodge Ram sold almost 500,000 trucks in 2016. The Tundra and Titan are even behind the mid-size trucks. I'm surprised the Titan is still around. As noted, the Tacoma is still King, but the updated Colorado/Canyon are not that far behind. The Ford Ranger is due to return, which will likely put a dent in the others' #'s. The Ridgeline IS in a sub-category/niche all its own, although it's considered a 'truck', and its buyers may be a unique group. The newly updated version is still selling well early in '17. But I agree that Subaru would be reluctant to re-enter that market unless they can do something w/broader appeal to the masses. Based on their current success, w/sales increasing year-over-year for the approx. the last 6 years, up 3% in 2015, and 11% in 2016, I don't see them changing their focus on gaining ground in the strong SUV/CUV markets. Last I read they were having some issues keeping up w/demand (cars101.com). The main issue, I see, is that the economy really dictates how well a niche model sells. Buyers are more open to spending $$ on something that may not be mainstream when they're not worried about paying the mortgage/losing their home in the next 6-months. You wouldn't see the Hellcat/Demon, Focus RS, Ford GT, Chevy SS (disco'd), possibly a new Supra, Civic Type R, Jeep truck (!), Hummer H1 return, etc, if the USA was in a Recession. FWIW, Td
-
Hi and Welcome, Have you yet driven the Crosstrek? They're a little weak in the power dept. Only one engine option: 2.0 148HP. The OB has the 3.6 option w/over 250. And the '17 OB is 'all new' supposedly, so might take a bit more search to see what's out there for the after-market.....the good news is that Subaru has been 'growing the brand' to the point that even those outside the Pacific NW's denizens are buying them more often. This usually leads to broader after-market support. One thing to note is that the OB and Foresters traditionally have had more ground clearance than some competitors, w/out the additional 'height' of a full SUV. You'd want to compare specs. Although 2" isn't much in Jeep-land, it's probably going to put you in a Stage 2 upgrade path, where you'd need to do more than just 'spacers'. The CVT question is valid. Not something I've read about, "How does it do w/non-stock, (aka taller) tires?" You could download the Owner's Manual and see what it says. Subaru of America (SOA) may also be worth a call/email. As noted by LT, dealing w/the warranty issues may not be worth it. Subaru hasn't proven to be any more lenient on 'mods' than other brands, from what I've come across. Unless you buy something sold @ the dealer under the Subaru label, it might be used against you. MPG 'shouldn't' be affected any differently than any other vehicle w/bigger/taller tires.... Your Jeep background probably knows where to look for that info?>>>>Unless that CVT has an (unknown) issue w/them. GL, TD
-
+1 to all the above ....And do you have any trusted/recommended Subie mechanics in your area? That's the place to get it done right....not the dealer. Search on here/online for upgrades, lifts, etc. There was a lifted Baja on ebay a few weeks back that was 'bada$$' but was WAY overpriced. They do seem to be holding their own in value, but that may be for the low-mileage gems.
-
Hi, We'll want to see pics. :-) As you seem to know, the SUS was an actual model in '97-'99. Per Cars101.com, yours was one of a 'few' avl. in NE: No offense, but yours may not be as unique as you're thinking. If it has the 2.5/EJ25D and the SUS emblem on the trunk, it's probably a factory model - not necessarily a 'demo' as stated. For best exposure you'll want to list it on Ebay. Or post on the Subie forums. GL, TD
-
google: Old:Tz1a3zs2aa 1999 Forester - only site OTHER than Russian was from an Australia site and it showed this trans attached to an EJ20. 'New": tz1a3zc3aa 2002 Forester - 2001-2002 - parts.subaru.com I'm going out on limb here....that original trans you removed was not the right one, either. I can't get to opposedforces.com from work but if you use that site and drill down to YOUR car - 2001 Outback - you'll find the 4EAT listed under the transmission section. And if you look under the TRAIN >> Differential (trans)>.Gear-set hypoid you'll see the FDR.
-
Hi and welcome to the USMB forum. Can you take the car to a mechanic / technician and have a Buyer's Inspection done? It may have suspension or other issues that need to be fixed. Unless all Swiss drive like Alain Menu or Andrea Chiesa, understeer shouldn't appear unless driven quite 'briskly' (fast). Good luck, TD
-
Hi and Welcome, - If you've read up on here, you've likely seen that the 1st potential remedy is to Drain>Refill>Drive - and repeat 3 times w/the ATF. Done that ? (I'm assuming this an Automatic / 4EAT.) - Do you have the AT Temp light flashing? If so, check - pull the codes w/the TCU/TCM handshake. - Put the FWD fuse in to verify whether it's Mechanical or Electrical. If the fuse does nothing, it's Electrical and you Duty C is dead; if the TB is gone w/the FWD fuse IN it's Mechanical and you need the Clutch Pack (CP). - I've not priced a CP, but the Duty C sounds about right. You can fix your CP by filing down the grooves, too. If you still go JDM remember to verify 2-3 times that the FD ratio is the same as yours: 4.44.
- 10 replies
-
- torque bind
- transmission
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Surely, w/1740 posts you've read this! :-) Yep on the fronts; Nope on the rears as they used a different top mount bolt pattern '95+. Swap the rear top hats to yours - make sure the spring matches as some years are tapered. You can also use up thru 2008 Forester struts - w/the same caveats in top hats. 2003-2008 give the most lift, IIRC. I'd also surmise there's a few (dozen?) posts on swapping out the air suspension opt./standard (?) also avl. on the LS/LSi, etc. models, per Cars101.com. GL, TD
-
Not an AT - type tire, so not comparable to the Yoko, but good to know they work as an AS. As this is the Off-Road forum, focusing on tires that work well (better than?) off the pavement, too.
-
See the attached for the VIN tag. As noted the TZxxx is 4EAT; TYxxxx is 5MT. Some of the online VIN decoders aren't 100% accurate; the VIN tag won't lie.
- 8 replies
-
- Legacy GT
- Outback transmission
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
We call them a MAF - mass airflow sensor - on here (and most Subie forums). Non-OEM shouldn't be a problem, but the issue is different now, correct? If the same, clean it w/some MAF sensor spray (brake cleaner is considered too harsh), or just swap in another used GREEN label plastic JECS or AUTECS MAF (22680AA160) from any '92-'98 Subaru Impreza, Legacy or Forester....'99 OB/GT/SUS, too.
- 15 replies
-
TireRack.com as of today no longer had any stock of the 215/70R-15 (26.9"), 205/70R15 (Stock '96-'99 OB), 215/60R16 (stock '98+ Forester S) or 215/65R16 (27") sizes. The 205/70R15 was on 'closeout' yesterday and low stock. They are still listed on Yoko's site. I've emailed both TR and Yoko to see what the status of these tires will be. Was looking to buy a set but not if I can't buy replacements down the road (pun intended). Anyone have an inside connection? Edit: From Yokohama - although they didn't mention WHAT the replacement is: Edit: Heard back from Tire Rack....this sounds like ALL AT-S are disco'd?