Numbchux

IIRC, all STis have a front LSD. at least USDM ones and later JDM ones.

what makes you say this? not being critical at all...I just haven't heard it before

it's similar, but the 5-speed has the lo range rod on the passenger side....but it's the same idea. Dr Krazy did it on his lifted EA82 sedan. do a search for his thread, he's got some good pics too.

no special pullers needed. not even for the tie rod end. as previously mentioned: 36mm socket/breaker bar 3/16th inch punch 12, 14 and 17mm sockets (for brake caliper etc.), 3/8ths is fine heavy hammer (I like my 3lb mini-sledge) 3/8 socket extension, between 3 and 5-6" long remove axle nut (put in park and set handbrake, should lock up the drivetrain enough to get it loose.) seperate hub from rotor (4 14mm? bolts on front near lug studs) pull hub off axle stub pop ball joint out of steering knuckle (12mm pinch bolt, then some prying) or, remove control arm to engine crossmember bolt and one of the 2 swaybar bolts pound out springpin from inner axle joint (start from the divoted side) pull inner axle joint out away from tranny (will need to swing the steering knuckle out too) once the axle is seperated from the tranny, pound axle stub through the wheel bearings. grease stub on 'new' axle (I LOVE junkyard axles!!!) reinstall in reverse.... a little hijack here. if you do want to seperate the tie rod end from the steering knuckle. no puller is needed. simply loosen the nut (but do not remove, this way if you miss with the maul, you don't mess up the threads) then hit the steering knuckle on the end near the tie rod end hard with a maul. this will cause the hole in the knuckle to change shape enough that it will pup the tie rod end loose from the knuckle, and the nut can be removed.

My buddy had a PP6 installed on his impreza L ('95 or '96...) and I helped him tune and modify his car quite a bit. The system worked quite well. but not enough for a turbo. when we started trying to advance ignition timing and really change the fuel maps, it would throw CEL codes, and run very poorly. but for a little extra power in a mildly modified application, this is a great system. and pretty much the only piggyback for an N/A application.

they don't weigh much as far as cars go, but they weigh a few times as much as an ATV. if an ATV + a couple people on it = subaru...then your ATV must weigh at least 3000 lbs!!!

I just hope they can handle the weight of a car on them, instead of an ATV....

there's no sense arguing this, but I will say this. down travel is limited by the shock. even with the trailing arm pulling the wheel forward, the shock stays virtually virtical, and so virtually all of it's extension goes straight down. here's almost full downtravel right after installing the lift: here's the pivot point pic: MorganM's fender trimming:

I'm not. the travel is limited by the shock. the arc just moves differently, not more, not less. I've back-to-back tested them (though didn't take any pics maybe later this summer we'll do it again), they flex virtually identically.

if you want to get an idea about how much you can cut without getting into the door. look for MorganM's image gallery, or if it isn't there, look for posts by him. I had his old wagon, and he cut his body out there as much as you can without cutting the door. He fit 29s (235/75r15) on a 3" BYB lifted wagon

I'm on the slowest dialup I've ever seen in my life right now, so no pics.... BUT, I have quite a bit of experience here to contribute....having owned/wheeled both a BYB lifted EA82, and AA one. GD has already said some of this, but I'm just going to repeat/rephrase some of it. the BYB/PK/Ozified kit doen'st move the rear wheel forward almost at all, because the rear trailing arm mounts are dropped. newer ones do utilize a bit more axle angle, but still drop it. the AA and SJR kits leave that mount up against the body (still could easily be done with a BYB kit, but it's not described in the instructions) which causes the trailing arm the pull the back wheel forward, but because the pivot is in the front, it can't get any closer. This sounds like a huge disadvantage to not drop them, but it leaves that same bracket, and the fuel pump (which is also attached there) VERY vulnerable. and contrary to popular belief (all of which generated by those with no experience with the design), suspension travel is NOT limited by that design. as for axle angles. the AA design is safe, but at the limit. I ran the 4" kit (not the 4/3, which leaves even more room for error by only lifting the rear 3") for awhile with it adjusted up another inch, and ate through 2 axles in the same weekend. but after dropping it back down to just 4" I have had zero problems, front or rear. and just to be safe, I added a 2" SJR diff shim for the front of the diff, so I can adjust the rear end up another inch, or even add accord springs (which I won't do, because those DO limit travel). if you'd like to search, in my photo gallery on this site (click photos at the top of the page, and then I should be 4th on the top poster list), I've got a pic of my rear wheel, with a big red dot where the trailing arm pivot is, and you can see that the hub cannot get any closer to that point, and therefore clearance there is not an issue. does that answer your question??

assuming you're keeping it longitudinal and having a second xmember to support the tranny, it'll be fine. if you're going all out and going transverse, you'll probably want to beef it up for the tranny weight aswell....but it doesn't sound like you're doing that... biodiesel? or WVO?? biodiesel isn't an advantage over anything, unless you're trying to support the farmers and such...it's at least as expensive, and not as efficient. WVO is just as efficient as regular diesel, and typically free

yep, they sell all sorts of kits, and I bet just got some mixed up....

my '92 legacy y-pipe fits almost perfectly, I just had to bash a little on the heat sheilding on the back of the piping right by the ports on the engine side to keep it from hitting the crossmember....but that's into an EA82

exactly, that's why this thread is filled with speculation, and individual experience. even when handled on an individual basis.... that said, I think 26-27s would be a safe bet, and doable with minimal work. 28s-29s would be possible, but with more damage, and still not garaunteed. also, keep in mind that tire sizes vary from tire to tire. a goodyear 205/70/r15 will probably be a bit different than a bfg one in the same size...and the swampers are probably bigger with the big lugs than the claimed size.

I would imagine it would be the same as replacing stripped lug studs on a 4-lug app. pound 'em out, then pound in new ones....

I'm fairly certain that's the exact same source I got my set from.....I had no problems.... sorry to hear it!

too many variables, how much trimming/beating, adjustable suspension or not, worn springs/torsion bar, etc.

Sweet! keep us updated, in a month or 2, I'll probably be up for 2

another bump....I really want one....

I did it, mostly because I just didn't want to unbolt the flexplate with it all still attached, and yep, just used a comealong, and pulled them apart, they actually come apart pretty easily (or did for me...)

if you can't say something nice...... Sarge, it's a pretty legit question, just ignore these guys. it really doesn't get asked too terribly often. anyway, I've got a buddy with an EA81 hatch, that had quick and easy access to 29" swampers and 15" chevy steelies, so he cranked up the adjustable suspension, drilled out the wheels, and mounted 'em up. he ended up completely removing the front fenders, which mostly solved the problem, but they still rubbed a bit on the firewall. but I don't think he could cut enough off the back to keep the fenders from cutting up the tread. so...to answer you're question, probably 27-28s....

possible? I've got a FWD 4EAT from a '92 legacy listed on CL right now, and I had a guy email me back saying he'd like to have it to replace his AWD 4EAT.... is this possible? I know there's wiring and such for the duty C stuff, so it definately wouldn't be possible (or easy anyway) to do it the other way around, but what if you just didn't connect them, would the FWD wiring plug into the AWD harness? just maybe with less pins....I dunno, I'm mostly thinking out loud here. I also have the TCU, so if the wiring is the same, he could maybe swap in the control unit and get it to work....

I've only had my EA82s up beyond that a handful of times, and they were all downhill and without A/C...

they didn't make them, the distributed them for 88hatchmonster. you can still order them through him. check for a link to his site in either the vender's forum, or the large thread here in the retrofitting forum about the swap.