wtdash

HI, Sounds like you've covered it. What year Foz? Miles? Does the AT Temp light flash on startup? The FWD fuse working tells you it's NOT electronic....>>>The Duty C solenoid IS working. I'd try a few more things. 1. Replace the ATF @ least 2+ more times>>Drain, Refill, Drive, Repeat....until it looks better than the tar you've got in there now. Whatever cheap ATF compatible you can find. 2. Find a gravel road or other loose surface and see if there's a delay in the back wheels engaging. 3. Reset the TCU codes - disconnect the battery for 30 minutes - and see what codes come back. #1 might help the TB to the point of being non-issue. #2 tells you the clutch packs are bad. GL, TD

Putting this here for posterity. #'s for the ORIGINAL Member's post #1 as they weren't posted and when the pics die so does the data: Block/Heads EJ25D/EJ22E frankenmotor w/Delta 220 cams HP: 128.31 Torque: 133.12 EJ251/EJ22E frankenmotor, stock cams HP: 118.42 Torque: 129.4 BTW, My Googling shows the Mustangs read LOWER than a Dynojet dyno. Thanks Td

Hi, What version of Legacy do you have? Or which engine do you have? The '95-'98 EJ22 are interchangeable. The '95 requires a dual-port (2 port) header/exhaust manifold; all others are Single-port (google it). The '96-'99 EJ25 are also interchangeable, but the '96 should be avoided due to a few inconsistencies w/the '97-'99 version. You can also use the '90-'94 EJ22, but requires a little more work, but if you can rebuild an engine, it's not an issue. The EJ22 and EJ25 are also interchangeable.....many people have swapped in the EJ22 for the EJ25 due to the head gasket issues. You can NOT easily use an EJ22 from '99+ as Subaru changed the wiring/electronics - same for the '00+ EJ25. No feedback on rebuilding. GL, Td

If the Foz WAS MAINTAINED @ the Dealer, they should have put the Subie conditioner in (not stop leak) when they did a coolant/anti-freeze service. It's a liquid w/a precipitate (?) that needs to be shaken before pouring in. If you're seeing what you're seeing where you're seeing it, than I'd save up for a HG job soon....it's inevitable anyway. Td

Gary... Couple of clarifications.....the '95 Outback (in name only as it didn't have the '96+ upgrades) was 4.11 FD ratio....since it only came w/ a 2.2 engine. All '96-'99 Autos had 4.44's since they all had the 2.5/EJ25D engine. The '99 was the phase II / phase 2 trans, so I'd not take a chance on that.....plus it's the one w/the 'delayed shifting' history. And since the OP is 'new to Subarus' I'll point out that the Legacy Outback and Impreza Outback are distinct models. TD

Well....I came across another tidbit that I overlooked: California vs. Federal ECUs. My car appears to be built for Cali as the 2.2 ECU showed up as : P/N: 22611ac930 - 2N It is defined as "low emissions". And the AutoCheck /VIN check I did on it shows it started life in LA, as a rental. Been doing some searching and haven't found anything definitive about the differences*, but would imagine the ECU's may be able to tell. The 2.5 ECU is Federal as far as I know. *I have both 02 sensors in the Front CatCon, vs one in the front and one in rear CC. The attached shows the O2 sensors for Cali. cars #27 and #41; #28 is for Fed versions.

Well, I give it a go and it's a No Go on the vacuum modification. Still popped the CEL. Next time I'm @ the local Pull and Save yard I'll see what the EJ25 cars have for a purge valve....but still doesn't explain how the ol' EJ22 works w/out a CEL on the 2.5>>2.2 swaps. Unless the 2.5 ECU is 'less picky'? Edit: Per my Subaru parts supplier: EDIT: Found this NASIOC POST that has some relevant info. And this info, which may (not) apply: Td

Thanks for the feedback/info. I'll try modifying the vacuum lines as suggested above (post #4) and if that doesn't work, probably just forget about it. Might grab one @ the wrecking yard on next visit. I've already removed the 2.5 ECU since I don't like the CEL being on. No issues/ no CEL w/the original 2.2 ECU back in. Car seemed to run OK but I didn't drive it much to verify. TD

- Correct - Correct - No Sir...swapped ECU for possible 'performance enhancement' :-) Attached is a pic under the Right Rear of my '96. I also didn't think they moved them to the rear 'til later....but there it is. Thanks

I'd recommend checking the CODE..... If there's something else besides the EGR valve you won't know it.

Got it...I'll give it a try. thanks

Just to clarify: 1996 Legacy L - 1/96 build date - 22611AC341 / 1Q According to the attached - opposedforces.com - this is from a '95-'96 build date Outback with the EJ25D - 1996-1999 EJ25D ECU / ECM / EGI part numbers for GT / LSi / Outback / SUS I don't have a charcoal canister by the front passenger side near the ABS module / pump. Thanks

No. Bought it from ebait for $35. But the next time I go to the local salvage yard, I'll take a look. The other thing this brings to mind is 'How do the '95-'98 EJ22 engines work as a replacement in the '96-'99 EJ25 cars?' If it's the 'pressure sources switching solenoid', that would make sense as that's over on the passenger strut tower w/the MAP sensor* so it stays w/the car - not the engine. So, the purge valve is likely not the cause........ Thanks again! Td *This is not the same as the MAP used instead of the MAF on non-turbo Subarus from ~'00-'04.

Hi, Final edit (?): Installed a '98 Legacy Outback ECU: 22611AD60A / 1Z I confirmed it had the charcoal canister in the back. So far after numerous starts and stops (i think it takes 2 cycles of the evap system to cause the CEL), and 3 days of driving NO CEL. Calling it good. Original Post: I have a '96 Legacy L w/the EJ22E. I read that the '96 OB/GT EJ25D ECU may give me a few more HP/Torque and higher redline to go w/my Delta cams. I installed the ECU (plug and play) and after a few minutes of driving the CEL pops on. I check it and get: P0441-evap control system purge flow fault / P0441 Evaporative Emission Control System Incorrect Purge Flow Read more at: http://www.obd-codes.com/p0441 Copyright OBD-Codes.com I cleared the code and it comes back w/in a few minutes of driving. I plugged in the Green diagnostic connectors under the dash and the Purge Valve Solenoid clicks, so it's getting power. Does anyone know if the 2.2 used a different purge valve than the 2.5? Looking on OpposedForces.com '96 does appear to be a transition year. But that site only lists one part number (even though the diagram shows an EJ22E and EJ22EZ - '97 & '98- reference). I have another purge valve in my collection but its connector is different and won't plug in. I'd need a different pigtail to splice in so didn't try it. Edit: Tried a '99 Legacy Outback ECU and got error P1116 - Engine Torque Control Cut Signal Circuit Low Input Read more: http://engine-codes.com/p1116_subaru.html#ixzz3n3RLQhHg Most likely due to that fact that the '99 was a transition year and the ECU and TCU don't like each other much. The error only appeared after a couple of restarts. Never drove the car to see how it ran....Looking for a '98 next. Thanks TD

Hi Did you check ECU codes? Try that. http://legacycentral.org/library/literature/codes.htm Gl TD

Hi You can't do this. Good luck Ok. More info: - as noted on here in multiple posts you'll find that that will not work because it's too different. Wiring, intakes are not interchangeable, and other "gotchas". - 99 2.5 is still phase 1 wiring and heads (short block is phase 2)

Yes...we have given you the help. Now please go get the Comp/Leak down test.....you won't like the result, but you'll know the cause. My '04 XT (same engine) did exactly as yours w/the burning oil when it lost a ringland. Td

HI and Welcome, 1. Use the sprockets that match the head....they may work but I'm not sure. 2. You'll have to compress the tensioner - hopefully you have the FSM (factory service manual) for instructions - do it wrong and it'll ruin it. 3. SOHC Intake Manifold must be used - NOT interchangeable between SOHC and DOHC. 4. No...use head bolts that match head...I 'think' they're too short for the SOHC. 5. Yes...ALL EJ-series share the same pattern. 6. Yes....all heads should be resurfaced B4 reinstall (@ least IMHO). 7. Depends....if the 2.2. is over 150K, probably. But wouldn't bother otherwise.....(I'm a hypocrite...my '96 EJ22 w/128K has a bad valve guide...so....yeah.) 8+. The 2.2 / EJ22 only had EGR on the AUTOMATIC-equipped engines. All EJ25's do/did. You CAN make it work w/the non-EGR port heads w/out drill/tapping.- Search for my post on it. 9+. Read up on what HG to use....it'll need to be a 2.5 bore, but there may be better versions for you....FRANKLY. BTW, Your '99 EJ25D is actually a 'hybrid' year, as it has the Phase 2 block w/the Phase 1 DOHC heads GL, Td

+1 Yes...they wear out and cheap. Td

Hi THIS POST may be helpful RE: the starter. The Misfire is unfortunately another (besides HG) Achilles Heel of Subarus. I'd be suspicious of the coil pack and if you've NOT done the VC gasket and plug seals, they're due. Also, since you've been dealing w/this for so long, I'd get a Compression and Leak Down Test done - not cheap, but neither is throwing parts @ it. GL, Td

Hi, HIGHly recommend you get your Search cap on and head on over to RS25.com. They cover all the Imprezas. Also, most sites have "Stickies/Stickys" @ the top of each section that are there as reference for Newbies like yourself. Many Subaru parts are interchangeable between models. Everything from the '91 Legacy Turbo to the 2007+ WRX have parts that would be an upgrade. I'm glad to see you want to do Suspension and Brakes b4 'power' upgrades. As they say, "It's more fun to drive a slow car fast, than a FAST car S-L-O-W. Gl, TD

If the switch doesn't change the AT temp light flashing, then it's wired in wrong...it may 'lock the diff', but w/the switch OFF - wiring same as stock - the AT light should stay off....unless you still had issues b4 this mod. Td

Hi, I've not done this mod recently (but want to on my '96)...but I think you need turn OFF the switch BEFORE turning the car on/off. It can't be left ON all the time, IIRC. It should've stated that in the Mod Thread. If you ARE turning it off/on then.....well, wait for more replies. GL (hope I'm right?), TD

Uh...the '06 Forester will be a 215/60R-16 which is a 26.1" tire. The TIRES MAY rub the lower strut perch (the spring holder-upper). But the wheels' bolt pattern is definitely the same so they would bolt-on, if there's clearance. GL, TD

Hi, Everything I've read states the '06 was the first year of the AVLS (AVCS was on Turbo engines). Read up on the Cars101.com site -look for Archives on the left column and then choose your year and model to compare. And they should be swappable...although you may need to swap the Intake Manifold (not hard). Go read over on Subaruforester.org, too.....lots of 'swap' posts there. GL, TD