-
Posts
23391 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
438
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by GeneralDisorder
-
We won't even bother with JDM engines or even used USDM engines anymore. Risk aversion.... we buy reman short blocks from Subaru parts or we build a new block with all new parts (even the block halves), or sometimes with heavy machine work on a 255/257 case. In the specific case of EJ205's we will sometimes toss in a complete JDM 205 with new timing but that is only if the customer is fully aware of the risks and the drawbacks. In that one case it can be considerably cheaper than a build or new block and the 205 is pretty tough if you don't push it or abuse it. Non turbos almost always get the Subaru reman blocks. 3yr/36k warranty through SOA. Not my balls on the chopping block if it lets go. Risk averse.... best deal at the highest quality for the customer. Lowest risk to the shop. Better customer satisfaction. GD
-
It's extremely risky TO split the block. The clearances are not a trifling matter on a split aluminum block. It will not go back together well if you haven't done quite a few of these and know the special tricks. You are 100% more likely to throw a rod bearing if you do split it than if you don't. GD
-
DR rebuild $800 price right?
GeneralDisorder replied to wagons's topic in Old Gen.: 80's GL/DL/XT/Loyales...
What gear oil are you running? Put Subaru HPGO in it. GD -
Cometic is ok - but I only use them if I need a special thickness. They are more expensive and less available than the factory gaskets. There is no real difference between 642 and 770 other than some minor cooling port shape differences. They don't matter and either work in every application in my experience. GD
- 12 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- head gaskets
- 2003 outback
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
642's were used on early turbo models. 04-06 STi IIRC. So they are not strictly an NA gasket. They do fit the porting on the SOHC heads a little better but we have and continue to use 770's on every engine when the 642's are not available. The porting really makes no difference at all. GD
- 12 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- head gaskets
- 2003 outback
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I don't recognize it given what you took apart and I've been through these engines hundreds of times. I just finished a 600 HP FXT for the West Coast Subaru Show. My guess would have been injector o-ring given the approximate dimensions but you ruled that out. Maybe it was laying on top of the engine from previous work on the injectors and just fell out when you pulled the engine. GD
-
The 95/96-ish ECU's aren't "fussy" at all. If you get into the later 90's ECU's then they want a bunch of extra fuel system sensors, etc. The OBD-II sensors are similar. I think everything is basically the same except throttle position... different ECU connectors. The 20G computer (93-96 JDM WRX, etc) is pin compatible with the 92 ECU except it has reversed cam/crank signals and shares a ground on one of the sensors. Easily correctly. It allows you to use the Enduring Solutions board from the UK which allows real-time tuning. GD
-
What is "VFD" standing for in this case? If other illumination on the same panel works and dims then I would agree it's likely not wiring. I've seen plenty of cracked solder joints on circuit boards - especially ones with buttons and controls. 05-09 Legacy radio/HVAC panels are garbage and prone to this sort of problem. MAP light assemblies also. I would get out my handheld microscope and start looking for cracked joints that I can reflow. GD
-
I usually pay about $75 for used prop-shafts. Call around. Just get a new Duty-C and the gaskets - it's not expensive. You have a running/driving car - do you really suppose that you can replace it with another running/driving car that doesn't have unknown and possibly debilitating problems for $250? 230k really isn't that high if it's been maintained. One of my loaner cars has 320k and customers routinely comment on how they are surprised that everything works, how much power it has, and how tight the car is. It's a one-owner 1990 Legacy 5MT. I have people offering to buy it all the time. High mileage is usually an indication of excellent maintenance. I've seen plenty of low mileage cars that were mechanically thrashed. I would rather buy something with 300k and a huge stack of records than one with 150k and no maintenance. GD
-
Any Subaru shop will be able to do a 2.2 swap - provided they can find an engine. Another alternative is to swap the pistons in the 25D to the 251 piston and then use the 255/257 head gasket. Cost is about $3500 for piston swap, skirt knurling, HG's, complete timing, all gaskets and seals, etc. 2.2 swap can come in around $2000 or so if you can find one. It's not my preferred way to fix those cars though. The 251 bottom end or pistons will mate up with the 25D heads nicely and resolves the HG issue. GD
-
Mountain Grizzly Vinyl Photos
GeneralDisorder replied to YnotDIY's topic in Old Gen.: 80's GL/DL/XT/Loyales...
Mick's web site is still active: http://www.indysworld.com/vehicles/past/1982-wagon-mtngrizz/mountaingrizzly.html Need to level up on your google-fu. GD